Measurements of Mandibular Length: A Comparison of Articulare vs Condylion

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 210-215

  Haas, D W ^a,c   Martinez, Fernando ^b   Eckert, George J ^a   Diers, Nelson R ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Articulare; Condylion; Functional appliances; J point; Leaf gauge; Mandibular growth; Open bite cephalogram

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CENTRIC RELATION; CEPHALOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, FUNCTIONAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0035380803     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Rakosi T. Cephalometric diagnoses for functional appliance therapy. In: Graber TM, Rakosi T, Petrovic Ag, eds. Dentofacial Orthopedics With Functional Appliances. St Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1997:107-124.
2. Ghafari J, Jacobsson-Hunt U, Higgins-Barber K, Beideman RW, Shofer FS, Laster LL. Identification of condylar anatomy affects the evaluation of mandibular growth: guidelines for accurate reporting and research. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;107: 645-652.
3. Aelbers CMF, Dermaut LR. Orthopedics in orthodontics: part I, fiction or reality - a review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:513-519.
4. Adenwalla ST, Kronman HJ, Attarzdeh F. Porion and condyle as cephalometric landmarks - an error study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;94:411-415.
5. Moore RN, Du Bois LM, Boice PA, Igel KA. The accuracy of measuring condylion location. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;95:344-347.
6. Thompson JR. The rest position of the mandible and its significance to dental science. J Am Dent Assoc. 1946;33:151-180.
7. Isaacson JR, Isaacson RJ, Speidel TM, Worms FW. Extreme variation in vertical facial growth and associated variation in skeletal and dental relations. Angle Orthod. 1971;41:219-229.
8. Williams S, Melsen B. The interplay between sagittal and vertical growth factors: an implant study of activator treatment. Am J Orthod. 1982;81:327-332.
9. Lewis AB, Roche AF, Wagner B. Pubertal spurts in cranial base and mandible comparisons within individuals. Angle Orthod. 1985;55:17-30.
10. De Vincenzo JP, Huffer RA, Winn MW. A study in human subjects using a new device designed to mimic the protrusive functional appliances used previously in monkeys. Am J Orthod. 1987;91:213-224.
11. Falck F, Fränkel R. Clinical relevance of step-by-step mandibular advancement in the treatment of mandibular retrusion using the Fränkel appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;96: 333-341.
12. Perillo L, Johnston LE, Ferro A. Permanence of skeletal changes after function regulator (FR-2) treatment of patients with retrusive Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996; 109:132-139.
13. Viteporn S, Athanasious AE. Anatomy, radiographic anatomy and cephalometric landmarks of craniofacial skeleton, soft tissue profile, dentition, pharynx and cervical vertebrae. In: Athanasiou AE, ed. Orthodontic Cephalometry. London, England: Mosby International; 1997:21-62.
14. Bjork A. The face in profile. Svensk Tandlarkare Tidskrift. 1947; 40(suppl 5B):32-33.
15. Williamson EH, Evans DL, Barton WA, Williams BH. The effect of bite plane use on terminal hinge axis location. Angle Orthod. 1977;47:25-33.
16. Muller R, Buttner P. A critical discussion of intraclass correlation coefficients. Stat Med. 1994;13:2465-2476.
17. Stickel A, Pancherz H. Can 'articulare' be used in the cephalometric analysis of mandibular length? A methodologic study. Eur J Orthod. 1988;10:362-368.
18. Nelson C, Harkness M, Herbison P. Mandibular changes during functional appliance treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;104:153-161.
19. Love RJ, Murray JM, Mamandras AH. Facial growth in males 16 to 20 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990; 97:200-206.
20. Foley TF, Mamandras AH. Facial growth in females 14 to 20 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;101:248-254.
21. Hägg U, Attstrom K. Mandibular growth estimated by four cephalometric measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992; 102:146-152.
22. Savara BS, Tracy WE, Miller PA. Analysis of errors in cephalometric measurements of three-dimensional distances on the human mandible. Arch Oral Biol. 1966;11:209-217.
23. Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod. 1971;60:111-127.
24. Forsberg CM, Odenrick L. Identification of the cephalometric reference point condylion on lateral head films. Angle Orthod. 1989; 59:123-130.
25. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Temporomandibular joint remodeling in adolescents and young adults during Herbst treatment: a prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric radiographic investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999; 115:607-618.