Effect of impression materials on hybridized dentin

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 85, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 568-574

  Nahon, Max ^a   Dentkos, Terence R ^a,b   Nelson, Steve K ^a   Gardner, F Michael ^a   Rillman, Ernest A ^a,c  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b Private Practice   (United States)

^c Private Practice   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; ALGINIC ACID; ALL BOND 2; ALL-BOND 2; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; ETHER DERIVATIVE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYSULFIDE; POLYVINYL DERIVATIVE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SILOXANE; SULFIDE; VINYL POLYSILOXANE; VISILUX 2;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLLOID; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; DRUG EFFECT; HUMAN; IMPREGUM; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SECRETION; STATISTICS; TOOTH PERMEABILITY;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADHESIVES; ALGINATES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COLLOIDS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTIN; DENTIN PERMEABILITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; DENTINAL FLUID; ETHERS; HUMANS; METHACRYLATES; POLYVINYLS; RESIN CEMENTS; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; SILOXANES; SMEAR LAYER; STATISTICS; SULFIDES;

EID: 0035380081     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2001.116169     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Richardson D, Tao L, Pashley DH. Dentin permeability: effects of crown preparation. Int J Prosthodont 1991;4:219-25.
2. Langeland K, Langeland LK. Pulp reactions to crown preparation, impression, temporary crown fixation, and permanent cementation. J Prosthet Dent 1965;15:129-43.
3. Dahl B. Dentin pulp reactions to full crown preparation procedures. J Oral Rehabil 1977;4:247-54.
4. Pashley DH. Smear layer: physiological considerations. Oper Dent Suppl 1984;3:13-29.
5. Derkson GD, Pashley DH, Derkson ME. Microleakage measurement of selected restorative materials: a new in vitro method. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:435-40.
6. Brannstrom M. The effect of dentin desiccation and aspirated odontoblasts on the pulp. J Prosthet Dent 1968;20:165-71.
7. Dormois LD, Murray GA, McKnight JP, Yates JL, Sharp HK. The influence of cement removal techniques on microleakage of stainless steels crowns. J Pedod 1982;7:63-7.
8. Pashley EL, Comer RW, Simpson MD, Horner JA, Pashley DH, Caughman WF. Dentin permeability: sealing the dentin in crown preparations. Oper Dent 1992;17:13-20.
9. Johnson GH, Powell LV, DeRouen TA. Evaluation and control of post-cementation pulpal sensitivity: zinc phosphate and glass ionomer luting cements. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:38-46.
10. Jackson CR, Skidmore AE, Rice RT. Pulpal evaluation of teeth restored with fixed prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:323-5.
11. Cheung GS. A preliminary investigation into the longevity and causes of failure of single unit extracoronal restorations. J Dent 1991;19:160-3.
12. Pashley DH, Andringa HJ, Derkson GD, Derkson ME, Kalathoor SR. Regional variability in the permeability of human dentine. Arch Oral Biol 1987;32:519-23.
13. Pashley DH. Clinical considerations of microleakage. J Endod 1990;16:70-7.
14. Felton D, Bergenholtz G, Kanoy BE. Evaluation of the desensitizing effect of Gluma Dentin Bond on teeth prepared for complete-coverage restorations. Int J Prosthodont 1991;4:292-8.
15. Dondi dall'Orologio G, Malferreri S. Desensitizing effects of Gluma and Gluma 2000 on hypersensitive dentin. Am J Dent 1993;6:283-6.
16. Trowbridge HO, Silver DR. A review of current approaches to in-office management of tooth hypersensitivity. Dent Clin North Am 1990;34:561-81.
17. Krauser JT. Hypersensitive teeth. Part I: etiology. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:153-6.
18. Dowell P, Addy M. Dentin hypersensitivity - a review. Aetiology, symptoms and theories of pain production. J Clin Periodontol 1983;10:341-50.
19. Brannstrom M, Anstrom A. A study of mechanism of pain elicited from the dentin. J Dent Res 1964;43:619-25.
20. Brannstrom M, Astrom A. The hydrodynamics of the dentin: its possible relationship to dentinal pain. Int Dent J 1972;22:219-27.
21. Brannstrom M, Johnson G. The sensory mechanism in human dentin as revealed by evaporation and mechanical removal of dentin. J Dent Res 1978;57:49-53.
22. Markowitz K, Kim S. Hypersensitive teeth. Experimental studies of dentinal desensitizing agents. Dent Clin North Am 1990;34:491-501.
23. Pashley DH. Dentin permeability, dentin sensitivity, and treatment through tubule occlusion. J Endod 1986;12:465-74.
24. Brannstrom M, Johnson G, Nordenvall KJ. Transmission and control of dentinal pain: resin impregnation for desensitization of dentin. J Am Dent Assoc 1979;99:612-8.
25. Nordenvall KJ, Brannstrom M. In vivo resin impregnation of dentinal tubules. J Prosthet Dent 1980;44:630-7.
26. Watanabe T, Sano M, Itch K, Wakumoto S. The effects of primers on the sensitivity of dentin. Dent Mater 1991;7:148-50.
27. Reikos S, Yoshiaki A, Manabu S, et al. Clinical evaluation of the sedative effect of HEMA solution of the hypersensitivity of dentin. Dent Mater 1990;9:163-6.
28. Bergenholtz G, Jontell M, Tuttle A, Knutsson G. Inhibition of serum albumin flux across exposed dentin following conditioning with GLUMA primer, glutaraldehyde or potassium oxalates. J Dent 1993;21:220-7.