|
Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 291-301
|
Using clinical practice analysis to improve care.
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;
ARTICLE;
ASPIRATION PNEUMONIA;
CLINICAL COMPETENCE;
COMMUNICABLE DISEASE;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
COST;
ECONOMICS;
EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW UP;
HEALTH CARE QUALITY;
HEALTH SERVICE;
HOSPITAL READMISSION;
HUMAN;
INFORMATION PROCESSING;
LENGTH OF STAY;
MALE;
MORTALITY;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT;
PHYSICIAN;
PNEUMONIA;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
QUALITY CONTROL;
STANDARD;
TIME;
TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
UNITED STATES;
ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS;
BENCHMARKING;
CLINICAL COMPETENCE;
COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED INFECTIONS;
COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS;
DATA COLLECTION;
EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
HEALTH SERVICES;
HUMANS;
LENGTH OF STAY;
MALE;
MISSISSIPPI;
OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE);
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE);
PATIENT READMISSION;
PHYSICIANS;
PNEUMONIA;
PNEUMONIA, ASPIRATION;
PRACTICE GUIDELINES;
QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;
TIME FACTORS;
TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE;
|
EID: 0035378675
PISSN: 10703241
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S1070-3241(01)27025-4 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (25)
|
References (0)
|