Orthodontic Outcomes Assessment Using the Peer Assessment Rating Index

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 164-169

  Dyken, Renee Allen ^a   Sadowsky, P Lionel ^b   Hurst, David ^c  

^a University of Alabama at Birmingham ^*  (United States)

^b Univ of Alabama School of Dentistry   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

American Board of Orthodontics; PAR Index; Treatment outcomes

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; MALOCCLUSION; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; ORTHODONTICS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PEER REVIEW; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL;

EPISODE OF CARE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALOCCLUSION; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PEER REVIEW, HEALTH CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOCIETIES, DENTAL; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0035378454     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Otuyemi OD, Jones SP. Methods of assessing and grading malocclusion: a review. Aust Orthod J. 1995;14:21-27.
2. Pickering EA, Vig PS. The occlusal index used to assess orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod. 1975;2:47-51.
3. Elderton RJ, Clark JD. Orthodontic treatment in the general dental service assessed by the occlusal index. Br J Orthod. 1983;10: 178-186.
4. Elderton RJ, Clark JD. An investigation of treatment in the general dental service for patients with Class II division 1 malocclusions. Br J Orthod. 1983;11:2-8.
5. Fink DF, Smith RJ. The duration of orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1992;102:45-51.
6. Richmond S, Shaw WC, O'Brien KD, Jones BR, Stephens CD, Roberts CT, Andrews M. The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod. 1992;14:125-139.
7. O'Brien KD, Shaw WC, Roberts CT. The use of occlusion indices in assessing the provision of orthodontic treatment by the hospital orthodontic service of England and Wales. Br J Orthod. 1993;15: 7-15.
8. Richmond S, Andrews M. Orthodontic treatment standards in Norway. Eur J Orhod. 1993;15:7-15.
9. Richmond S. Personal audit in orthodontics. Eur J Orthod. 1993; 20:135-145.
10. Kerr WJS, Buchanan IB, McColl JH. Use of the PAR Index in assessing the effectiveness of removable orthodontic appliances. Br J Orthod. 1993;20:351-357.
11. Fox NA. The first 100 cases: a personal audit of orthodontic treatment assessed by the PAR (Peer Assessment Rating) Index. Br Dent J. 1993;174:290-297.
12. Otuyemi OD, Jones SP. Long-term evaluation of treated Class II division 1 malocclusions utilizing the PAR Index. Br J Orthod. 1995;22:171-178.
13. O'Brien KD, Robbins R, Vig KWL, Vig PS, Shnorhokian H, Weyant R. The effectiveness of Class II, division 1 treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1995;107:329-334.
14. American Board of Orthodontics. The American Board of Orthodontics Examination Information. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: 1994:1.
15. Deguzman L, Bahirael D, Vig KWL, Vig RJ, Weyant, O'Brien K. The validation of the Peer Assessment Rating Index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1995;107:172-176.
16. Richmond S, Shaw WC, Andrews M, Roberts CT. The PAR Index: methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. Eur J Orthod. 1992;14:180-187.
17. Salzman JA. Handicapping malocclusion assessment to establish treatment priority. Eur J Orthod. 1992;14:125-139.