Comparison of 2 modifications of the Twin-block appliance in matched Class II samples

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 119, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 572-577

  Parkin, Nicola Ann ^b   McKeown, Helen Fiona ^b   Sandler, Paul Jonathan ^a  

^a CHESTERFIELD ROYAL HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; TORQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; EXTRAORAL TRACTION APPLIANCES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, FUNCTIONAL; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; TORQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0035377218     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mod.2001.113790     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Lund DI, Sandier PJ. The effects of Twin Blocks: a prospective controlled study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;133:104-10.
2. Mills CM, McCulloch KJ. Treatment effects of the twin block appliance: a cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:15-24.
3. Illing HM, Morris DO, Lee RT. A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part I - The hard tissues. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:501-16.
4. Creekmore TD, Radney LJ. Frankel appliance therapy: orthopedic or orthodontic? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1983;83:89-108.
5. McNamara JA, Bookstein FL, Shaughnessy TG. Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy in class II patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1985;88:91-110.
6. Teuscher U. A growth-related concept for skeletal class II treatment. Am J Orthod 1978;74:258-75.
7. Lagerstrom LO, Neilsen IL, Lee R, Isaacson RJ. Dental and skeletal contributions to occlusal correction in patients treated with high-pull headgear-activator combination. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;97:495-504.
8. van Beek H. Combination headgear-activator. J Clin Orthod 1984;18:185-9.
9. Bass NM. Dento-facial orthopaedics in the correction of class II malocclusions. Br J Orthod 1982;9:3-31.
10. Birkebaek L, Melsen B, Terp S. A laminographic study of alterations in the temperomandibular joint following activator treatment. Eur J Orthod 1984;6:257-66.
11. Weislander L, Lagerstrom L. The effect of activator treatment on class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1979;75:20-5.
12. Weislander L. Long-term effect of treatment with the headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Stability or relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:319-29.
13. Pancherz H. Treatment of class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod 1979;76:423-41.
14. Pancherz H, Malmgren O, Hagg U, Omblus J, Hansen K. Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy. Eur J Orthod 1989;11:17-30.
15. Drage KJ, Hunt NP. Overjet relapse following functional appliance therapy. Br J Orthod 1990;17:205-13.
16. Keeling SD, Wheeler TT, King GJ, Garvan CW, Cohen DA, Cabassa S, et al. Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early class II treatment with bionators and headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:40-50.
17. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;8:307-10.