The impact of altruism and envy on competitive behavior and satisfaction

International Journal of Research in Marketing

Volumn 18, Issue 1-2, 2001, Pages 5-17

  Lehmann, Donald R ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Altruism; Competitor; Envy; Satistfaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035373859     PISSN: 01678116     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8116(01)00026-X     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adams J.S. Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 67:1963;422-436.
2. Assunção J., Lehmann D.R. The impact of others' welfare in bargaining problems. Paper Presented at the Marketing Science Conference, London, U.K., Summer 1992. 1992.
3. Bettman J.R., Luce M.F., Payne J.W. Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of Consumer Research. 25:1998;17-187. December.
4. Bolton G.E. Strong and weak equity effects - Evidence, significance, and origins. Budescu D.V., Erev I., Zwick R. Games and Human Behavior. 1999;203-236 Lawrence, Mahwah, NJ.
5. Carpenter G.S., Nakamoto K. Consumer preference formation and pioneering advantage. Journal of Marketing Research. 26:1989;285-298.
6. Corfman K.P., Lehmann D.R. Models of cooperative group decision-making and relative influence: An experimental investigation of family purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research. 14:1987;1-13. June.
7. Corfman K.P., Lehmann D.R. The importance of others' welfare in evaluating bargaining outcomes. Journal of Consumer Research. 20:1993;124-137. June.
8. Deutsch M., Kotik P. Altruism and bargaining. Sauermann H. Contributions to Experimental Economics: Bargaining Behavior. Vol. 7:1978;20-40 Mohr, Tubingen.
9. Fishburn P.C., Sarin R.K. Fairness and social risk: II. Aggregated analyses. Management Science. 43:1997;15-26. January.
10. Gupta S., Livne Z.A. Testing the emergence and effect of the reference outcome in an integrative bargaining situation. Management Science. 34:1988;1303-1314. November.
11. Güth W. On the effects of the pricing rule in auction and fair division games - An experimental study. Budescu D.V., Erev I., Zwick R. Games and Human Behavior. 1999;237-258 Lawrence, Mahwah, NJ.
12. Hardie B.G.S., Johnson E.J., Fader P.S. Modeling loss aversion and reference dependent effects on brand choice. Marketing Science. 12:1993;378-394. Fall.
13. Helsen H. Adaptation Level Theory. 1964;Harper and Row, New York.
14. Hill B.M. Zipf's law and prior distributions for the composition of a population. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 65:1970;1220-1232.
15. Kahnemann D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrika. 47:1979;263-290.
16. Kahneman D., Knetsch J.L., Thaler R. Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. American Economic Review. 76(4):1986;728-741. March.
17. Kalai E., Smorodinsky M. Other solutions to Nash's bargaining problem. Econometrica. 43:1975;5113-5118. May.
18. Keeney R.L., Kirkwood C.W. Group decision making using cardinal social welfare functions. Management Science. 22:1975;430-437. December.
19. Kopalle P., Lehmann D.R. Strategic management of expectations: the role of disconfirmation sensitivity and perfectionism. Journal of Marketing Research. 2000;. in press.
20. Land E.A., Tyler T.R. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. 1988;Plenum, New York.
21. Levin, D.K., 1996. Modeling altruism and spitefulness in experiments, Working Paper, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
22. Lowenstein G.R., Thompson L., Bazerman M.H. Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 57:1989;426-441. September.
23. McAlister L. A dynamic attribute satiation model of variety-seeking behavior. Journal of Consumer Research. 9:1982;141-150. September.
24. Messick D.M., Cooke K.S. Equity Theory. 1983;Praeger, New York.
25. Messick D.M., Sentis K.P. Fairness and preference. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 15:1979;418-434. July.
26. Nash J.F. Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica. 21:1950;128-140. January.
27. Neslin S.A., Greenhalgh L. Nash's theory of cooperative games as a predictor of the outcomes of buyer-seller negotiations: an experiment in media purchasing. Journal of Marketing Research. 20:1983;368-379. November.
28. Neslin S.A., Greenhalgh L. The ability of Nash's theory of cooperative games to predict the outcomes of buyer-seller negotiations: A dyad-level test. Management Science. 32:1986;480-498. April.
29. Oliver R.L. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research. 17:1980;460-469. November.
30. Rabin, M., 1991. Incorporating fairness into game theory. Working Paper 91-185, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
31. Simonson I., Tversky A. Choice in context: Trade-off contrast and extremeness aversion. Journal of Marketing Research. 29:1992;281-295. August.
32. Stanley M.H.R., Buldyrev S.V., Havlin S., Mangegna R.N., Salinger M.A., Stanley H.E. Zipf's plots and the size distribution of firms. Economics Letters. 49:1995;453-457.
33. Tangley L. Law of the jungle: altruism. U.S. News and World Report. 126:1999;53-54. February 15.
34. Winer R.S. A reference price model of brand choice for frequently purchased products. Journal of Consumer Research. 13(2):1986;250-256.
35. Zipf G.K. Psycho-Biology of Languages. 1935;Houghton-Mifflin, New York.