Direct numerical simulation of incompressible turbulent flows

Computers and Fluids

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 555-579

  Friedrich, R ^a   Huttl T J ^a   Manhart, M ^a   Wagner, C ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b GERMAN AEROSPACE CENTER DLR   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GEOMETRY; INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW; KINETIC ENERGY; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

PERMEABLE PIPES;

TURBULENT FLOW;

COMPUTER MODELING; INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW; TURBULENT FLOW;

EID: 0035371193     PISSN: 00457930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0045-7930(01)00006-8     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Akselvoll K., Moin P. An efficient method for temporal integration of the Navier-Stokes equations in confined axisymmetric geometries. J Computat Phys. 125:1996;454-463.
2. Antonia R.A., Kim J. Low-Reynolds-number effects on near-wall turbulence. J Fluid Mech. 276:1994;61-80.
3. Canuto C., Hussaini M.Y., Quarteroni A., Zang T.A. Spectral methods in fluid mechanics. 1988;Springer, New York.
4. Choi H., Moin P. Effects of the computational time step on numerical solutions of turbulent flow. J Computat Phys. 113:1994;1-4.
5. Choi H, Moin P, Kim J. Turbulent drag reduction: studies of feedback control and flow over riblets. Rep. TF-55, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1992.
6. Choi H., Moin P., Kim J. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over riblets. J Fluid Mech. 255:1993;503-539.
7. Choi H., Moin P., Kim J. Active turbulence control for drag reduction in wall-bounded flows. J Fluid Mech. 262:1994;75-110.
8. Chorin A.J. Numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations. Math Computat. 22:1968;745-762.
9. Deng G.B., Piquet J., Quentey P., Visonneau M. Navier-Stokes equations for incompressible flows: finite difference and finite volume methods. Peyret R. Handbook of computational fluid mechanics. 1996;25-97 Academic Press, London.
10. Dervieux A. About the basic numerical methods. In: Peyret R, editor. Handbook of computational fluid mechanics. London: Academic Press; 1996. p. 1-23.
11. Eckelmann H. Einführung in die Strömungsmechanik. Stuttgart: Teubner; 1997. p. 270-2.
12. Eggels J.G.M., Unger F., Weiss M.H., Westerweel J., Adrian R.J., Friedrich R., Nieuwstadt F.T.M. Fully developed turbulent pipe flow: a comparison between direct numerical simulation and experiment. J Fluid Mech. 268:1994;175-209.
13. Ferziger J.H., Perić M. Computational methods for fluid dynamics. 1996;Springer, Berlin.
14. Fischer P.F. An overlapping Schwarz method for spectral element solution of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. J Computat Phys. 133:1997;84-101.
15. Friedrich R, Lechner R, Sesterhenn J, Hüttl TJ. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent compressible and incompressible wall-bounded shear flows. In: Knight D, Sakell L, editors. Recent advances in DNS and LES. Proceedings of the Second AFOSR International Conference on Direct Numerical Simulation and Large Eddy Simulation, Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, USA. 7-9 June, 1999, Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1999. p. 13-26.
16. Friedrich R, Wagner C. On turbulent flow in a sudden pipe expansion and its reverse transfer of subgrid-scale energy. Lecture notes in physics 453, 1995. p. 330-6.
17. Gavrilakis S. Numerical simulation of low-Reynolds-number turbulent flow through a straight square duct. J Fluid Mech. 244:1992;101-129.
18. Germano M. On the effect of torsion on a helical pipe flow. J Fluid Mech. 125:1982;1-8.
19. Golub G.H., van Loan C. Matrix computations. 1990;Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
20. Hackbusch W. Multi-grid methods and applications. 1985;Springer, New York.
21. Härtel C. Turbulent flows: direct numerical simulation and large-eddy simulation. Peyret R. Handbook of computational fluid mechanics. 1996;283-338 Academic Press, London.
22. Härtel C., Kleiser L. Analysis and modelling of subgrid-scale motions in near-wall turbulence. J Fluid Mech. 356:1998;327-352.
23. Härtel C., Kleiser L., Michaud M., Stein C.F. A direct numerical simulation approach to the study of intrusion fronts. J Eng Math. 32:1997;103-120.
24. Harlow F.H., Welsh J.E. Numerical calculation of time-dependent viscous incompressible flow with free surface. Phys Fluids. 8:1965;2182-2189.
25. Hüttl TJ, Friedrich R. Fully developed laminar flow in curved or helically coiled pipes. DGLR-Jahrbuch, DGLR-JT97-181, 1997. S. 1203-10.
26. Hüttl TJ, Friedrich R. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flows in curved and helically coiled pipes. Proceedings of the Third Asian Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, vol. 2. Bangalore, India, 7-11 December, 1998. p. 183-8.
27. Hüttl TJ, Friedrich R. High performance computing of turbulent flow in complex pipe geometries. In: Krause E, Jäger W, editors. High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering '98. Transactions of the High Performance Computing Center Stuttgart (HLRS), 1998. Springer; 1999. p. 236-51.
28. Hüttl TJ, Friedrich R. Fully developed turbulent flow in conduits with circular cross section. In: Nitsche W, et al., editors. New results in numerical and experimental fluid mechanics II. Contributions to the 11th AG STAB/DGLR Symposium, Berlin; Notes Numer Fluid Mech 1999;72:242-9.
29. Hüttl TJ, Friedrich R. Influence of curvature and torsion on turbulent flow in helically coiled pipes. In: Rodi W, Laurence D, editors. Engineering turbulence modelling and experiments 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1999. p. 247-56.
30. Hüttl TJ, Friedrich R. Turbulent flow in coiled pipes. In: Proceedings of the Joint INI/ERCOFTAC Workshop on Direct and Large-Eddy Simulation, vol. 3, paper 3.6. Isaac Newton Institute, Cambridge. 12-14 May, 1999.
31. Hüttl TJ, Wagner C, Friedrich R. Navier-Stokes solutions of laminar flows based on orthogonal helical coordinates. In: Taylor C, Cross J, editors. Numerical methods in laminar and turbulent flow, vol. 10. Swansea, UK: Pineridge Press; 1997. S. 191-202.
32. Hüttl T.J., Wagner C., Friedrich R. Navier Stokes solutions of laminar flows based on orthogonal helical co-ordinates. Int J Numer Meth Fluids. 29:1999;749-763.
33. Huser A., Biringen S. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow in a square duct. J Fluid Mech. 257:1993;65-95.
34. Jiménez J., Moin P. The minimal flow unit in near-wall turbulence. J Fluid Mech. 225:1991;213-240.
35. Karniadakis GE, Orszag SA, Ronquist EM, Patera AT. In: Gunzberger MD, Nicolaides RA, editors. Incompressible computational fluid dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993. p. 203-66.
36. Kasagi N., Shikazono N. Contribution of direct numerical simulation to understanding and modelling turbulent transport. Proc R Soc London Ser A. 451:1995;257-292.
37. Kim J., Moin P., Moser R. Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. J Fluid Mech. 177:1987;133-166.
38. Kleiser L., Zang ThA. Numerical simulation of transition in wall-bounded shear flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 23:1991;495-537.
39. Kravchenko A.G., Moin P., Moser R. Zonal embedded grids for numerical simulations of wall bounded turbulent flows. J Computat Phys. 127:1996;412-423.
40. Le H, Moin P. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over a backward-facing step. Rep. TF-58, Thermosciences Division, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, 1994.
41. Le H., Moin P., Kim J. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over a backward-facing step. J Fluid Mech. 330:1997;349-374.
42. Lee MJ, Kim J, Moin P. Turbulence structure at high shear rate. Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium Turbulent Shear Flows, Toulouse, 1987. p. 22-6-1-6.
43. Lele S.K. Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. J Computat Phys. 103:1992;16-42.
44. Lesieur M, Comte P, Métais O. Direct numerical simulations of turbulence. In: Hirsch Ch, editor. Computational methods in applied sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1992. p. 37-43.
45. Lim J., Choi H., Kim J. Control of streamwise vortices with uniform magnetic fluxes. Phys Fluids. 10:1998;1997-2005.
46. Lowery PS, Reynolds WC. Numerical simulation of a spatially-developing, forced, plane mixing layer. Rep. TF-26, Thermosciences Division, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, 1986.
47. Lund T.S., Wu X., Squires K.D. Generation of turbulent inflow data for spatially-developing boundary layer simulations. J Computat Phys. 140:1998;233-258.
48. Manhart M. Zonal direct numerical simulation of turbulent plane channel flow. Notes on numerical fluid mechanics, vol. 64. Braunschweig: Vieweg; 1998.
49. Manhart M, Deng GB, Hüttl TJ, Tremblay F, Segal A, Friedrich R, Piquet J, Wesseling P. The minimal turbulent flow unit as a test case for three different computer codes. Notes on numerical fluid mechanics, vol. 66. Braunschweig: Vieweg; 1998.
50. Moin P., Mahesh K. Direct numerical simulation: a tool in turbulence research. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 30:1998;539-578.
51. Moser R., Moin P. The effects of curvature in wall-bounded turbulent flows. J Fluid Mech. 175:1987;479-510.
52. Moser R.D., Rogers M. The three-dimensional evolution of a plane mixing layer: pairing and transition to turbulence. J Fluid Mech. 247:1993;275-320.
53. Na Y., Moin P. Direct numerical simulation of a separated turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech. 370:1998;175-201.
54. Neves J.C., Moin P., Moser R.D. Effects of convex transverse curvature on wall-bounded turbulence. Part 1: The velocity and vorticity. J Fluid Mech. 272:1994;349-381.
55. Neves J.C., Moin P., Moser R.D. Effects of convex transverse curvature on wall-bounded turbulence. Part 2: The pressure fluctuations. J Fluid Mech. 272:1994;383-406.
56. Perot B., Moin P. Shear-free turbulent boundary layers. Part 1: Physical insights into near-wall turbulence. J Fluid Mech. 295:1995;199-227.
57. Perot B., Moin P. Shear-free turbulent boundary layers. Part 2: New concepts for Reynolds stress transport equation modelling of inhomogeneous flows. J Fluid Mech. 295:1995;229-245.
58. Peyret R., Taylor T.D. Computational methods for fluid flow. 1983;Springer, New York.
59. Reynolds WC. The potential and limitations of direct and large eddy simulations. In: Gatski TB, Sarkar S, Speziale CG, editors. Advances in turbulence. New York: Springer; 1990. p. 88-104.
60. Richter K, Friedrich R, Schmitt L. Large-eddy simulation of turbulent wall boundary layers with pressure gradient. In: Durst, et al., editors. Proceedings of the 6th Symposium Turbulent Shear Flows, Toulouse, France, 1987. p. 22-3-1-7.
61. Rogallo R.S., Moin P. Numerical simulation of turbulent flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 16:1984;99-137.
62. Saad Y., Schultz M.H. GMRES: a generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving non-symmetric linear systems. SIAM J Sci Stat Computat. 7:1986;856-869.
63. Schlichting H. Boundary-layer theory. 1968;McGraw-Hill, New York.
64. Spalart P.R. Numerical study of sink-flow boundary layers. J Fluid Mech. 172:1986;307-328.
65. θ=1410 J Fluid Mech. 187:1988;61-98.
66. Sumitani Y., Kasagi N. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent transport with uniform wall injection and suction. AIAA J. 33:1995;1220-1228.
67. Temam R. On an approximate solution of the Navier-Stokes equations by the method of fractional steps. Part 1. Archiv Ration Mech Anal. 32:1969;135-153.
68. Van den Vorst H.A. BI-CGSTAB: a fast and smoothly converging variant of BI-CG for the solution of non-symmetric linear systems. SIAM J Sci Stat Computat. 13:1992;631-644.
69. Van den Vorst HA, Sonneveld P. CGSTAB, a more smoothly converging variant of CGS. Tech. Report 90-50, Delft University of Technology, 1990.
70. Vincent A., Meneguzzi M. The spatial structure and statistical properties of homogeneous turbulence. J Fluid Mech. 225:1991;1-20.
71. Wagner C. Direkte numerische Simulation turbulenter Strömungen in einer Rohrerweiterung. VDI-Fortschrittsberichte, Reihe 7, Nr. 283. Düsseldorf: VDI; 1996.
72. Wagner C, Friedrich R. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow in a sudden pipe expansion. Application of direct and large Eddy simulation to tansition and turbulence. AGARD-CP-551. Nevilly-sur-Seine: Agard; 1994.
73. Wagner C, Friedrich R. Turbulent flow in a sudden pipe expansion. In: Benzi R, editor. Advances in turbulence V. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1995. p. 544-8.
74. Wagner C., Friedrich R. On the turbulence structure in solid and permeable pipes. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 19:1998;459-469.
75. Wagner C, Friedrich R. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow through permeable or rough pipes. In: Papailiou KD, et al., editors. Computational Fluid Dynamics '98, vol. 1. New York: Wiley; 1998. p. 238-43.
76. Wesseling P. Introduction to multigrid methods. 1992;Wiley, Chichester.
77. Wesseling P, Segal A, Kassels CGM, Bijl H. Computing flows on general two-dimensional nonsmooth staggered grids. J Engng Math, in press.
78. Wesseling P., Segal A., van Kan J.J.I.M., Oosterlee C.W., Kassels C.G.M. Finite volume discretization of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in general coordinates on staggered grids. Computat Fluid Dyn J. 1:1992;27-33.
79. Westerweel J, Adrian RJ, Eggels JGM, Nieuwstadt FTM. Measurements with PIV in fully developed pipe flow at low Reynolds number. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Applications of Laser Technique to Fluid Mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal. 20-23 July, 1992.