Analysis of steady-state tracking errors in sampled-data systems with uncertainty

Automatica

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 889-897

  Khammash, M H ^a   Zou, L ^b  

^a Iowa State University of Science and Technology   (United States)

^b TEXAS INSTRUMENTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Robust control; Robust tracking; Sampled data systems; Steady state tracking

Indexed keywords

ERROR ANALYSIS; LINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); SYSTEM STABILITY; TIME VARYING CONTROL SYSTEMS; UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS;

STEADY-STATE TRACKING;

SAMPLED DATA CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 0035371011     PISSN: 00051098     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0005-1098(01)00031-0     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bartle R.G., Sherbert D.R. Introduction to real analysis. 1982;Wiley, New York.
2. ∞ sampled-data control IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 37:1992;418-435.
3. 2 problem for sampled-data systems Systems and Control Letters. 19:1992;1-12.
4. ∞ -induced norm for sampled-data systems IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 38(5):1993;717-732.
5. 2 -induced norm of a sampled-data system Systems and Control Letters. 15:1990;211-219.
6. Chen T., Francis B. Optimal sampled-data control systems. 1995;Springer, New York.
7. 1 performance in sampled-data control systems. Master's thesis, University of Toronto.
8. 1 performance in sampled-data systems IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 37:1992;436-446.
9. Dullerud G., Glover K. Robust stabilization of sampled-data systems to structured LTI perturbations. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 38:1993;1497-1508.
10. Horn R., Johnson C. Matrix analysis. 1985;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. Kabamba, P. T., & Hara, S. (1990). On computing the induced norm of a sampled-data system. Proceedings of American control conference (pp. 319-320).
12. Khammash M., Pearson J.B. Performance robustness of discrete-time systems with structured uncertainty. IEEE Transactions Automatic Control. 36(4):1991;398-412.
13. Khammash M. Necessary and sufficient conditions for the robustness of time-varying systems with applications to sampled-data systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 38(1):1993;49-57.
14. Khammash M., Pearson J.B. Analysis and design for robust performance with structured uncertainty. Systems and Control Letters. 20:1993;179-187.
15. Khammash M. Robust steady-state tracking. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 40(11):1995;1872-1880.
16. Sivashankar N., Khargonekar P.P. Induced norms of sampled-data systems. Automatica. 28:1992;1267-1272.
17. Sivashankar N., Khargonekar P.P. Robust stability and performance analysis of sampled-data systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 38(1):1993;58-69.
18. ∞ optimality criterion Automatica. 28:1992;45-54.
19. Yamamoto, Y. (1990). New approach to sampled-data systems: A function space method. Proceedings of the conference on decision and control (pp. 1882-1887).
20. Yamamoto Y. A function space approach to sampled-data control systems and tracking problems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 39:1994;703-712.
21. Zou, Z., & Khammash, M. (1997). Robust steady-state tracking of sampled-data systems, Proceedings of the American Control Conference, 3616-3620.
22. Zou, L. (1998). Studies in robust control: Analysis of sampled-data systems and aircraft pitch control. Ph.D. thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.
23. Zou, L., & Khammash, M. (1998). Robust steady-state tracking for periodic systems, Proceedings of the American Control Conference, 660-664.