How many do you see? The use of nonspoken representations in first-grade mathematics lessons

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 93, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 330-345

  Flevares, Lucia M ^a   Perry, Michelle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035354479     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.330     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alibali, M. W., Flevares, L. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1997). Assessing knowledge conveyed in gesture: Do teachers have the upper hand? Journal of Educational Psychology, 23, 183-194.
2. Alibali, M. W., Kita, S., & Young, A. J. (2000). Gesture and the process of speech production: We think, therefore we gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 593-613.
3. Baroody, A. J. (1989). Manipulatives don't come with guarantees. Arithmetic Teacher, 4-5.
4. Bickmore-Brand, J. (1993). Applying language learning principles to mathematics teaching. In M. Stephens, A. Waywood, D. Clarke, & J. Izard (Eds.), Communicating mathematics: Perspectives from classroom practice and current research (pp. 75-84). Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
5. Carson, J. C., & Bostick, R. N. (1988). Math instruction using media and modality strengths: How . . . it figures. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
6. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
7. Crowder, E. M. (1996). Gestures at work in sense-making science talk. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5, 173-208.
8. Dienes, Z. P. (1960). Building up mathematics. New York: Hutchison Educational.
9. Engle, R. (1998, August). Not channels but composite signals: Speech, gesture, diagrams, and object demonstrations are integrated in multi-modal explanations. Paper presented at the meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Madison, WI.
10. Fujimori, Y. (1997). Gestures in the classroom in Japan and the United States. Unpublished manuscript, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
11. Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (1999). Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Processes, 28, 1-26.
12. Goldenberg, E. P. (1995). Multiple representations: A vehicle for understanding understanding. In D. N. Perkins, J. L. Schwartz, M. M. West, & M. S. Wiske (Eds.), Software goes to school (pp. 155-171). New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Goldin, G. A., & Kaput, J. J. (1996). A joint perspective on the idea of representation in learning and doing mathematics. In L. P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. A. Goldin, & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 397-430). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Goldin-Meadow, S., Kim, S., & Singer, M. (1999). What the teacher's hands tell the student's mind about math. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 720-730.
15. Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1992). Links between teaching and learning place value with understanding in first grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 98-122.
16. Kirk, R. E. (1995). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
17. Lampert, M. (1986). Knowing, doing, and teaching multiplication. Cognition and Instruction, 3, 305-342.
18. Leinhardt, G., & Schwarz, B. B. (1997). Seeing the problem: An explanation from Polya. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 395-434.
19. Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1987). Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 33-41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers' understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32, 1-19.
22. Mayer, R. E., & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 389-401.
23. McCoy, L. P., Baker, T. H., & Little, L. S. (1996). Using multiple representations to communicate: An algebra challenge. In P. C. Elliott & M. J. Kenney (Eds.), Communication in Mathematics, K-12 and Beyond (pp. 40-44). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
24. McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Miller, K. F., & Stigler, J. W. (1987). Counting in Chinese: Cultural variation in a basic cognitive skill. Cognitive Development, 2, 279-305.
26. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
27. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
28. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
29. Pea, R. D. (1987). Cognitive technologies for mathematics education. In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 89-122). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Perry, M., Berch, D., & Singleton, J. (1995). Constructing shared understanding: The role of nonspoken input in learning contexts. Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 6, 213-235.
31. Pimm, D. (1987). Speaking mathematically. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
32. Pimm, D. (1995). Symbols and meanings in school mathematics. London: Routledge.
33. Sidak, Z. (1967). Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, 626-633.
34. Sowell, E. J. (1989). Effects of manipulative materials in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 498-505.
35. Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295-312.
36. Tarmizi, R. A., & Sweller, J. (1988). Guidance during mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 424-436.
37. Wagreich, P., Goldberg, H., Beissinger, J. S., Cirulis, A. E., Gartzman, M., Inzerillo, C., Isaacs, A., Kelso, C. R., & Peters, L. (1997). Math trailblazers: A mathematical journey using science and language arts. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
38. Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason. London: Routledge.
39. Webb, N. M., Gold, K., & Qi, S. (1990). Mathematical problem-solving processes and performance: Translations among symbolic representations. (CSE No. 316). Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Training.
40. Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458-477.