Information technology literacy: Task knowledge and mental models

Library Trends

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 73-86

  Brandt, D Scott ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035354391     PISSN: 00242594     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. American Library Association. (1989). American Library Association Presidential Committee on Information Literacy. Final Report. Chicago: ALA.
2. Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL). (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Chicago: American Library Association. Retrieved June 20, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://www.ala.org/acrl/ilintro.html#ildef.
3. ASTD. (2000). American Society for Training & Development. Training basics community. Retrieved April 21, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.astd.org/ virtual_community/comm_trainbasics/.
4. Brandt, D. S. (1997). Constructivism: Teaching for understanding of the Internet. Communications of the ACM, 40(10), 112-117.
5. DeBourcy, H. (1989). Technology literacy training - The ACTT method. THE Journal: Technological Horizons in Education, 16(9), 66-69.
6. Dewald, N.; Scholz-Crane, A.; Booth, A.; & Levine, C. (2000). Information literacy at a distance: Instructional design issues. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 26(1), 33-44.
7. Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1996). The systematic design of instruction. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
8. Dimitroff, A. (1992). Mental models theory and search outcome in a bibliographic retrieval system. Library & Information Science Research, 14(2), 141-156.
9. Dupuis, E. (1997). The information literacy challenge: Addressing the changing needs of our students. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 2(2 & 3), 93-111.
10. Eadie, T. (1992). Beyond immodesty: Questioning the benefits of BI. Research Strategies, 10(3), 105-110.
11. Gentner, D., & Gentner, D. R. (1983). Flowing waters or teeming crowds: Mental models of electricity. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 99-127). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Greeno, J. G. (1983). Conceptual entities. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 227-251). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Loveless, A., & Longman, D. (1998). Information literacy: Innuendo or insight? Education and Information Technologies, 3(1), 27-40.
14. McGregor, J. H. (1994). Information seeking and use: Students' thinking and their mental models. Journal of Youth Services in Libraries, 8(1), 69-76.
15. Nahl-Jakobovits, D., & Jakobovits, L. (2000). Bibliographic instructional design for information literacy: Integrating affective and cognitive objectives. Research Strategies, 11(2), 73-88.
16. National Research Council (NRC). (1999). Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications. Committee on Information Technology Literacy, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board. Being fluent with information technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Retrieved June 20, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/BeFIT/.
17. Pask, J. M.; Kramer, R.; & Mandernack, S. (1993). The savvy student's guide to library research. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University, Undergraduate Library.
18. Prorak, D.; Cottschalk, T.; & Pollastro, M. (1994). Teaching methods and psychological type in bibliographic instruction: Effect on student learning and confidence. RQ 33(4), 484-495.
19. Resnick, L. B. (1989). Knowing, learning, and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Seel, N. M. (1995). Mental models, knowledge transfer, and teaching strategies. Journal of Structural Learning, 12(3), 197-213.
21. Tobin, K., & D. Pippin. (1993). Constructivism as a referent for teaching and learning. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education. Washington, DC: AAAA Press.
22. Turkle, S. (1997). Seeing through computers: Education in a culture of simulation. American Prospect, 8(31), 76-82.