Monthly model for genetic evaluation of laying hens 1. Fixed regression

British Poultry Science

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 191-196

  Anang, A ^a   Mielenz, N ^a   Schuler L ^a  

^a MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREEDING; CHICKEN; EGG LAYING; EVALUATION; FEMALE; GENETICS; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BREEDING; CHICKENS; FEMALE; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; OVIPOSITION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 0035350257     PISSN: 00071668     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00071660120048438     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. ADAMS, C.J. & BELL, D.D. (1980) Predicting poultry egg production. Poultry Science, 59: 937-938.
2. ALI, T.E. & SCHAEFFER, L.R. (1987) Accounting for covariances among test day milk yield in dairy cows. Cangdian Journal of Animal Science, 67: 637-644.
3. AYYAGARI, V., MOHAPATRA, S.C., VENKATRAMAIAH , A., THIAGASUNDARAM, T., CHOUDHURI, D., JOHRI D.C. & RENGANATHAN, P. (1980) Selection for egg production on part records. 1 Evaluation of short term response to selection. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 57: 277-283.
4. CRAIG, J.V., BlSWAS, D.K. & SAADEH, H.K. (1969) Genetic variation and correlated responses in chickens selected for part year rate of egg production. Poultry Science, 48: 1288-1296.
5. DOPP, L., SCHMUTZ, M., REENTS, R. & REINHARDT, F. (1998) Anwendung des Testtagsmodells zur offiziellen Zuchtwertschätung für Milcleistungsmerkmale bei Schwarzbunt, Rotbunt und Rotvieh. Vortragstagung der DGfZ und der GfT am September, Berlin.
6. EMMERLING, R., THALLER, G., AUMANN, J. & AVERDUNK, G. (1998) Voruntersuchungen zur optimalen Definition des Herdentesttagseffektes beim Braunvieh. 75, Sitzung des Ausschusses für genetich-statistische Methoden in der Tierzucht der Deuthchen Gesellschaft fur Züchtungkunde, Duderstadt, Oktober.
7. GARWOOD, V.A. & LOWE, P.C. (1979) Comparison of individual, sire family and index selection for short term rate of egg production in chickens. Poultry Science, 58: 751-753.
8. GARWOOD, V.A., LOWE, P.C. & BOHREN, B.B. (1980) An experiment test of the efficiency of family selection in chickens. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 56: 5-9.
9. GOWE, R.S. & FAIRFULL, R.W. (1985) The direct response to long-term selection for multiple traits in egg stocks and changes in genetic parameters with selection, in: Poultry Genetics and Breeding. HILL, W.G. MANSON, J.M. & HEWITT, D., (eds) (Harlow, British Poultry Science)
10. GROENEVELD, E. (1990) PEST User's Manual. Institute of Animal Husbandry and Animal Behaviour, Federal Agricultural Research Centre.
11. GROENEVELD, E. (1998) VCE4 User's Guide and Reference Manual. Versi 1.1.
12. IBE, S.N., RUTLEDGE, J.J. & MCGIBBON, W.H. (1982) Curvilinear trends in direct and some correlated response to 19 generations of selection for part record rate of egg production in a randombred line of chickens. Poultry Science, 61: 821-828.
13. KINNEY, T.B., BOHREN, B.B., CRAIG, J.V. & LOWE, P.C. (1970) Response to individual, family or index selection for short term rate of egg production in chickens. Poultry Science, 49: 1052-1064.
14. MCMILLAN, I. (1981) Compartmental model analysis of poultry egg production curves. Poultry Science, 60: 1549-1551.
15. MCMILLAN, I., FITZ-EARLE, M., BUTLER, L. & ROBSON, D.S. (1970) Quantitative genetics of fertility I. Lifetime egg production of Drosophila melanogaster. Theoretical Genetics, 65: 349-353.
16. MCNALLY, D.H. (1971) Mathematical model for poultry egg production. Biometrics, 27: 735-737.
17. MIELENZ, N., GROENEVELD, E., MÜLLER, J. & SPILKE, J. (1994) Simultaneous estimation of variances and covariances using REML and Henderson 3 in a selected population of white leghorns. British Poultry Science, 35: 669-676.
18. MÜLLER, J. & GÖTZE, S. (1993) Selection criterion improving the feed efficiency in laying hens. Archiv für Tierzucht, 36: 205-211.
19. POEGGENPOEL, D.G. & ERASMUS, J.E. (1978) Long-term selection for increased egg production. British Poultry Science, 19: 111-123.
20. POGGENPOEL, D.G., FERREIRA, G.F., HAYES, J.P. & DU PREEZ, J.J. (1996) Response to long-term selection for egg production in laying hens. British Poultry Science, 37: 743-756.
21. PREISINGER, VON R. & SAVAS, T. (1997) Vergleich zweier Methoden zur Schätzung der Varianzkomponenten für Leistungsmerkmale bei Legehennen. Züchtungskunde, 69: 142-152.
22. PTAK, E. & SCHAEFFER, L.R. (1993) The use of test day yields for genetic evaluation of dairy sires and cows. Livestock Production Science, 34: 23-34.
23. REENTS, R., DEKKER, J.C.M. & SCHAEFFER, L.R. (1995a) Genetic evaluation for somatic cell score with a test day model for multiple lactation. Journal of Dairy Science, 78: 2858-2870.
24. REENTS, R., JAMROZIK, J., SCHAEFFER, L.R. & DEKKERS, J.C.M. (1995b) Estimation of genetic parameters for test day records of somatic cell score. Journal of Dairy Science, 78: 2874-2857.
25. SAADEH, H.K., CRAIG, J.V., SMITH, L.T. & WEARDEN, S. (1968) Effectiveness of alternative breeding systems for increasing rate of egg production in chickens. Poultry Science, 47: 1057-1072.
26. SAS INSTITUTE (1990) User' Guide, Vers 6.03 (Cary, NC, SAS Institute).
27. SAVAS, T., PREISIGNER, R., ROHE, R. & KALM, E. (1998) Genetische Parameter und optimale Prüfdauer für Legeleistung anhan von Taillegeleistungen bei Legehennen. Archiv für Tierzucht, 41: 421-432.
28. SWALVE, H.H. (1995) The effect of test day model on the estimation of genetic parameters and breeding values for dairy yield traits. Journal of Dairy Science, 78: 929-938.
29. SWALVE, H.H. (1998) The use of test day records for genetic evaluation. Proceedings of the 6th WCGALP, 23: 295-302.
30. VAN VLECK, L.D. & DOOLITTLE, D.P. (1964) Genetic parameters of monthly egg production in the Cornell controls. Poultry Science, 43: 560-567.
31. WOOD, P.D.P. (1967) Algebratic model of the lactation curve in cattle. Nature, 216: 164-165.
32. YANG, N., WU, C. & MCMILLAN, I. (1989) A new mathematical model of poultry egg production. Poultry Science, 68: 476-481.