Effect of Spreader and Accessory Cone Size on Density of Obturation Using Conventional or Mechanical Lateral Condensation

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 358-361

  Gound, Tom G ^a   Riehm, Richard J ^a   Odgaard, Eric C ^b   Makkawy, Hany ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GUTTA PERCHA;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL MODELS; GUTTA-PERCHA; HUMANS; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; ROOT CANAL OBTURATION;

EID: 0035349416     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200105000-00013     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Ingle Jl, Bakland LK. Endodontics. 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins 1994;228-307.
2. Hall EM. The mechanics of root-canal treatment. J Am Dent Assoc 1930;17:88-108.
3. Jerome CE, Hicks ML, Pelleu GB Jr. Compatibility of accessory guttapercha cones used with two types of spreaders. J Endodon 1988;14:428-34.
4. Allison DA, Michelich RJ, Walton RE. The influence of the master cone adaptation on the quality of the apical seal. J Endodon 1981;7:61-5.