Shrinkage stresses associated with incremental composite filling techniques in conservative class II restorations

Journal of Dentistry for Children

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 161-167

  Jedrychowski, Joseph R ^a   Bleier, Robert G ^a   Caputo, Angelo A ^a  

^a UCLA SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Composites; Conservative Class II restorations; Incremental filling; Polymerization contraction; Posterior composite restorations; Primary molar preparations; Shrinkage

Indexed keywords

POLYMER; RESIN;

ARTICLE; BIREFRINGENCE; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH;

BIREFRINGENCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR; POLYMERS;

EID: 0035348892     PISSN: 15518949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Marks, L.A.M.; van Amerongen, W.E.; Kreulen, C.M. et al: Conservative interproximal box-only polyacid modified composite restorations in primary molars, twelve-month clinical results. J Dent Child, 66:23-29, January-February 1999.
2. Wilder, A.D.; May, K. N.; Strickland, W.D.: Amalgam Restorations for Class II Cavity Preparations. In: The Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. Sturdevant, C. M. et al, eds. Third edition, 1995.
3. Lai, J.H. and Johnson, A.E.: Measuring polymerization shrinkage of photoactivated restorative materials by a water-filled dilatometer. Dent Mater, 9:139-143, March 1993.
4. Bowen, R.L.; Nemoto, K.; Rapson, J.E.: Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues: forces developing in composite materials during hardening. J Am Dent Assoc, 106:475-477, April 1983.
5. Jensen, M.E. and Chan, D.C.N.: Polymerization shrinkage and microleakage. In: Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials. Vanherle, G. and Smith, D.C., editors. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Peter Szuk Publishing Co., pp 243-262, 1996.
6. Hickman, J. and Jacobsen, P. H.: Finite element analysis of dental polymeric restorations. Clin Mater, 7:39-43, January 1991.
7. Tajima, K.; Chen, K.; Terashita; M. et al: Occurrence of marginal enamel cracking in composite resin restored teeth. J Dent Res, 72 [Spec Issue-Abstract]:136, March 1993.
8. Winkler, M.M.; Katona, T.R.; Paydar, N.H.: Finite element stress analysis of three filling techniques for class V light-cured composite restorations. J Dent Res, 75:1477-1483, July 1996.
9. McCullock, A.J. and Smith, B.G.N.: In vitro studies of cuspal movement produced by adhesive restorative materials. Br Dent J, 161:405-409, December 1986.
10. Suliman, A.A.; Boyer, D.B.; Lakes, R.S.: Cusp movement in premolars resulting from composite polymerization shrinkage. Dent Mater, 9:6-10, January 1993.
11. Leinfelder, K.F.: Using composite resin as a posterior restorative material. J Am Dent Assoc, 122:65-70, April 1991.
12. Magnum, F.l.; Berry, E.A.; DeSchepper, E. et al: Microleakage of incremental versus compression matrix bulk filling of cervical resin composite restorations. Gen Dent, 42:304-308, July-August 1994.
13. Jedrychowski, J.; Bleier, R.; Caputo, A.A., Shrinkage stresses associated with various incremental composite filling techniques. J Dent Child, 65:111-115, March-April 1998.
14. Versluis, A.; Douglas, W.H.; Cross, M. et al: Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J Dent Res, 75:871-878, March 1996.