Alternative method of hemorrhage control in full strength formocresol pulpotomy

Pediatric Dentistry

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 217-222

  Thompson, Kimberly S ^a   Scale, N Sue ^b   Nunn, Martha E ^c   Huff, Gene ^a  

^a Texas A and M University ^*

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; FORMOCRESOL;

ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DRUG EFFECT; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMOSTASIS; HUMAN; INFANT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; SURVIVAL RATE; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH PERIAPICAL DISEASE; TOOTH PULP; TOOTH PULP DISEASE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DENTAL PULP; DENTAL PULP CALCIFICATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FORMOCRESOLS; HEMORRHAGE; HEMOSTATIC TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; INFANT; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MOLAR; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERIAPICAL DISEASES; PULPOTOMY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROOT CANAL IRRIGANTS; ROOT RESORPTION; STATISTICS; SURVIVAL RATE; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0035348511     PISSN: 01641263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. th ed. Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd; 1996:144.
2. Redig DF. A comparison and evaluation of two-formocresol pulpotomy technics utilizing "Buckley's" formula. ASDC J Dent Child 35:22-30, 1968.
3. Berger JE. Pulp tissue reaction to formocresol and zinc oxide eugenol. J Dent Child. 32:12-28, 1965.
4. Morawa AP, Straffon LH, Han SS, Corpron RE. Clinical evaluation of pulpotomies using dilute formocresol. J Dent Child 42:360-363, 1975.
5. Beaver HA, Kopel HM, Sabes WR. The effect of zinc-oxide eugenol cement on a formocresolized pulp. J Dent Child 33:381-396, 1966.
6. Dannenburg J Pedodontic Endodontics, DCNA. 18(2), April 1974.
7. th ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Yearbook, Inc; 1994:438.
8. rd ed. WB Saunders Company; 1999:261-262.
9. Lemon RR, Steele PJ, Jeansome BG. Ferric sulfate hemostasis: effect on osseous wound healing left in situ for maximum exposure. J Endodontics 19:170-173, 1993.
10. Smith NL, Scale NS, Nunn ME. Ferric sulfate pulpotomy in primary molars: A retrospective study. Pediatr Dent 22:192-199, 2000.
11. Fei AL, Udin RD, Johnson R. A clinical study of ferric sulfate as a pulpotomy agent in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 13:327-332, 1991.
12. Fuks AB, Holan G, Davis JM, Eidelman E. Ferric sulfate versus dilute formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: long term follow up. Pediatr Dent 19:327-330, 1997.
13. Ibricevic H, Al-Jame Q. Ferric sulfate as a pulpotomy agent in primary teeth: 20 month clinical follow up. Clin Pediatr Dent 24:269-272, 2000.
14. Tenney JP. Personal communication. Baylor College of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry. August 2000.
15. Verco PJW, Allen KR. Formocresol pulpotomies in primary teeth. J Int Ass Dent Child 15:51-55, 1984.
16. Farooq NS, Coll JA, Kuwabara A, Shelton P. Success rates of formocresol pulpotomy and indirect pulp therapy in the treatment of deep dentinal caries in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 22:278-286, 2000.
17. Willard RM. Radiographic changes following formocresol pulpotomy in primary molars. ASDC J Dent Child 43:414-415, 1976.
18. Magnusson B. Therapeutic pulpotomy in primary molarsclinical and histological followup. Odontol Revy 22:275-289, 1971.
19. Myers DR, Shoaf HK, Dirksen TR, Pashley DH, Whitford GM, Reynolds KE. Distribution of 14C-formaldehyde after pulpotomy with formocresol. JADA 96:805-13, 1978.
20. Gardner T. The Treatment of Exposed Pulps in Deciduous Teeth and of Abscessed Deciduous Teeth. Int Otho D 21:876-878, 1935.