|
Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 2234-2236
|
Monitoring of ATG therapy by flow cytometry: Comparison of one single-platform and two different dual-platform methods
a a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CD3 ANTIGEN;
IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE AGENT;
LEUKOCYTE ANTIGEN;
LYMPHOCYTE ANTIBODY;
ARTICLE;
AUTOMATION;
B LYMPHOCYTE;
BLOOD;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
COMPUTER PROGRAM;
DRUG MONITORING;
FLOW CYTOMETRY;
HUMAN;
IMMUNOLOGY;
KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION;
LYMPHOCYTE COUNT;
METHODOLOGY;
NATURAL KILLER CELL;
PHYSIOLOGY;
REGRESSION ANALYSIS;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
T LYMPHOCYTE;
ANTIGENS, CD;
ANTIGENS, CD3;
ANTILYMPHOCYTE SERUM;
AUTOMATION;
B-LYMPHOCYTES;
DRUG MONITORING;
FLOW CYTOMETRY;
HUMANS;
IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE AGENTS;
KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION;
KILLER CELLS, NATURAL;
LYMPHOCYTE COUNT;
REGRESSION ANALYSIS;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SOFTWARE;
T-LYMPHOCYTES;
|
EID: 0035347519
PISSN: 00411345
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0041-1345(01)01950-9 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (5)
|
References (17)
|