Argus: A suite of tools for research in complex cognition

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 130-140

  Schoelles, Michael J ^a   Gray, Wayne D ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPUTER; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; RESEARCH;

COGNITION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTERS; HUMANS; RESEARCH; SOFTWARE;

EID: 0035345870     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195358     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. ALTMANN, E. M., & GRAY, W. D. (2000). Managing attention by preparing to forget. In Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 44th Annual Meeting (pp. 152-155). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
2. ANDERSON, J. R., & LEBIÈRE, C. (EDS.) (1998). Atomic components of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. ANDERSON, J. R., MATESSA, M., & LEBIÈRE, C. (1997). ACT-R: A theory of higher-level cognition and its relation to visual attention. Human-Computer Interaction, 12, 439-462.
4. BALLARD, D. H., HAYHOE, M. M., & PELZ, J. B. (1995). Memory representations in natural tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 66-80.
5. BALLARD, D. H., HAYHOE, M. M., POOK, P. K., & RAO, R. P. N. (1997). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 20, 723-742.
6. BALLAS, J. A., HEITMEYER, C. L., & PEREZ, M. A. (1992). Evaluating two aspects of direct manipulation in advanced cockpits. In Proceedings of ACM CHI'92 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 127-134). New York: ACM Press.
7. BYRNE, M. D. (1999). ACT-R/PM Documentation [On-line]. Available: http://chil.rice.edu/byrne/RPM/docs/index.html
8. BYRNE, M. D., & ANDERSON, J. R. (1998). Perception and action. In J. R. Anderson & C. Lebière (Eds.), The atomic components of thought (pp. 167-200). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. DONCHIN, E. (1995). Video games as research tools: The Space Fortress game. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27, 217-223.
10. DWYER, D. J., HALL, J. K., VOLPE, C., & CANNON-BOWERS, J. A. (1992). A performance assessment task for examining tactical decision making under stress (Special Rep. 92-002). Orlando, FL: Naval Training System Center.
11. GILLILAND, S. W., & LANDIS, R. S. (1992). Quality and quantity goals in a complex decision task: Strategies and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 672-681.
12. GRAY, W. D. in press. Simulated task environments: The role of high-fidelity simulations, scaled worlds, synthetic environments, and micro-worlds in basic and applied cognitive research. Cognitive Science Quarterly and Kognitionswissenschaft (Special joint issue).
13. HART, S. G., & STAVELAND, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139-183). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
14. HOLLENBECK, J. R., ILGEN, D. R., SEGO, D. J., HEDLUND, J., MAJOR, D. M., & PHILLIPS, J. (1995). Mutlilevel theory of team decision making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 292-316.
15. 2 simulation. In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance, assessment, and measurement: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 111-136). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. KIERAS, D. E., & MEYER, D. E. (1997). An overview of the EPIC architecture for cognition and performance with application to human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 12, 391-438.
17. RITTER, F. E., BAXTER, G. D., JONES, G., & YOUNG, R. M. (2000). Supporting cognitive models as users. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7, 141-173.
18. SALVUCCI, D. D. (2000). A model of eye movements and visual attention. In N. Taatgen & J. Aasman (Eds.), Third International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (pp. 252-259). Veenendal, The Netherlands: Universal Press.