Retrospective analysis of an experimental high-throughput screening data set by recursive partitioning

Journal of Combinatorial Chemistry

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 267-277

  Van Rhee, A Michiel ^a   Stocker, Jon ^a   Printzenhoff, David ^a   Creech, Chris ^a   Wagoner, P Kay ^a   Spear, Kerry L ^a  

^a Icagen Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; STEREOISOMERISM; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES; DRUG EVALUATION; MODELS, MOLECULAR; STEREOISOMERISM; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 0035345246     PISSN: 15204766     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/cc0000747     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Delaney, J. S. Assessing The Ability of Chemical Similarity Measures to Discriminate Between Active and Inactive Compounds. Mol. Diversity 1995, 1, 217-222.
2. Bayley, M. J.; Willett, P. Binning Schemes for Partition-Based Compound Selection. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 1999, 17, 10-18.
3. Wang, J.; Ramnarayan, K. Toward Designing Drug-Like Libraries: A Novel Computational Approach for Prediction of Drug Feasibility of Compounds. J. Comb. Chem. 1999, 1, 524-533.
4. Klopman, G. The MultiCASE Program II. Baseline Activity Identification Algorithm (BAIA). J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 78-81.
5. Burden, F. R. Holographic Neural Networks as Nonlinear Discriminants for Chemical Applications. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 47-53.
6. Bemis, G. W.; Murcko, M. A. The Properties of Known Drugs. 1. Molecular Frameworks. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 2887-2893.
7. Magalhães, N. S. S.; Cabrai De Holanda Cavalcanti, S.; Alencar De Menezes, I. R.; Antunes De Sousa Araújo, A.; Magalhães De Oliveira, H.; Alves, A. J. Automated Search for Potentially Active Compounds by Using Cluster Trees. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 34, 83-92.
8. Chen, X.; Rusinko, A.; Tropsha, A.; Young, S. S. Automated Pharmacophore Identification for Large Chemical Data Sets. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 887-896.
9. Available Chemical Directory. MDL Information Systems Inc.: San Leandro, CA.
10. Current Medicinal Chemistry. MDL Information Systems Inc.: San Leandro, CA.
11. World Drug Index. Derwent Inc.: Vienna, VA.
12. Coffen, D. L.; Baldino, C. M.; Lange, M.; Tilton, R. F.; Tu, C. Molecular Diversity, Biological Activity and Common Ground Shared by Both. Med. Chem. Res. 1998, 8, 206-218.
13. Lucic, B.; Trinajstic, N. Multivariate Regression Outperforms Several Robust Architectures of Neural Networks in QSAR Modeling. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 121-132.
14. Fujita, T.; Mansch, C. Analysis of the Structure-Activity Relationship of the Sulfonamide Drugs Using Substituent Constants. J. Med. Chem. 1967, 10, 991-1000.
15. Hunt, P. A. QSAR Using 2D descriptors and TRIPOS' SIMCA. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1999, 13, 453-467.
16. Rogers, D.; Hopfinger, A. J. Application of Genetic Function Approximation to Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships and Quantitative Structure-Property Relationships. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 854-866.
17. Dohoo, I. R.; Ducrot, C.; Fourichon, C.; Donald, A.; Hurnik, D. An Overview of Techniques for Dealing with Large Numbers of Independent Variables in Epidemiologic7 Studies. Prev. Vet. Med. 1997, 29, 221-239.
18. Holzgrabe, U.; Mohr, K. Allosteric Modulators of Ligand Binding to Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors. Drug Discovery Today 1998, 5, 214-222.
19. Zwart, R.; Vijverberg, H. P. Potentiation and Inhibition of Neuronal Nicotinic Receptors by Atropine: Competitive and Noncompetitive Effects. Mol. Pharmacol. 1997, 52, 886-895.
20. Chen, H. S.; Liptin, S. A. Mechanism of Memantine Block of NMDA-activated Channels in Rat Retinal Ganglion Cells: Uncompetitive Antagonism. J. Physiol. 1997, 499 (Pt 1), 27-46.
21. Nelson, L. M.; Bloch, D. A.; Longstreth, W. T.; Shi, H. Recursive Partitioning for the Identification of Disease Risk Subgroups: A Case-Control Study of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1998, 51, 199-209.
22. Cook, E. F.; Goldman, L. Empiric Comparison of Multivariate Analytic Techniques: Advantages and Disadvantages of Recursive Partitioning Analysis. J. Chron. Dis. 1984, 37, 721-731.
23. Hand, D. J. Statistical Methods in Diagnosis. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 1992, 1, 49-67.
24. Scott, C. B.; Scarantino, C.; Urtasun, R.; Movsas, B.; Jones, C. U.; Simpson, J. R.; Fischbach, A. J.; Curran, W. J. Validation and Predictive Power of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Recursive Partitioning Analysis Classes for Malignant Glioma Patients: A Report Using RTOG 90-06. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., Biol., Phys. 1998, 40, 51-55.
25. Lacher, D. A. Comparison of Non-parametric Recursive Partitioning to Parametric Discriminant Analyses in Laboratory Differentiation of Hypercalcemia. Clin. Chim. Acta 1991, 204, 199-208.
26. Dobbertin, M.; Biging, G. S. Using the nonparametric classifier CART to model forest tree mortality. Forest Sci. 1998, 44, 507-516.
27. Topliss, J. G. Utilization of Operational Schemes for Analog Synthesis in Drug Design. J. Med. Chem. 1972, 15, 1006-1011.
28. Topliss, J. G. A Manual Method for Applying the Hansch Approach to Drug Design. J. Med. Chem. 1977, 20, 463-469.
29. Breiman, L.; Friedman, J. H.; Olshen, R. A.; Stone, C. J. Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth, 1984.
30. 9 Full Factorial Chemical Library. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 2784-2788.
31. Rusinko, A. R.; Farmen, M. W.; Lambert, C. G.; Brown, P. L.; Young, S. S. Analysis of a Large Structure/Biological Activity Data Set Using Recursive Partitioning. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 1017-1026.
32. MDL Drug Data Report. MDL Information Systems Inc.: San Leandro, CA.
33. Hassan, M.; Bielawski, J. P.; Hempel, J. C.; Waldman, M. Optimization and Visualization of Molecular Diversity of Combinatorial Libraries. Mol. Diversity 1996, 2, 64-74.
34. Higgs, R. E.; Bemis, K. G.; Watson, I. A.; Wikel, J. H. Experimental Designs for Selecting Molecules from Large Chemical Databases. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 861-870.
35. Charifson, P. S.; Corkery, J. J.; Murcko, M. A.; Walters, W. P. Consensus Scoring: A Method for Obtaining Improved Hit Rates from Docking Databases of Three-Dimensional Structures into Proteins. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 5100-5109.
36. Young, S. S.; Sheffield, C. F.; Farmen, M. Optimum Utilization of a Compound Collection or Chemical Library for Drug Discovery. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 892-899.
37. Constans, P.; Hirst, J. D. Nonparametric Regression Applied to Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 452-459.
38. McGregor, M. J.; Pallai, P. V. Clustering Large Databases of Compounds: Using the MDL "Keys" as Structural Descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 443-448.
39. Matter, H.; Pötter, T. Comparing 3D Pharmacophore Triplets and 2D Fingerprints for Selecting Diverse Compound Subsets. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 1211-1225.
40. 1-adrenergic receptor antagonists. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1999, 7, 2437-2451.
41. Kier, L. B.; Hall, L. H. Molecular Structure Description: The Electrotopological State; Academic Press: New York, 1999.
42. Dixon, S. L.; Villar, H. O. Investigation of Classification Methods for the Prediction of Activity in Diverse Chemical Libraries. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1999, 13, 533-545.
43. Gao, H.; Bajorath, J. Comparison of Binary and 2D QSAR Analyses Using Inhibitors of Human Carbonic Anhydrase II as a Test Case. Mol. Diversity 1999, 4, 115-130.