Practical application of the prudent layperson standard [2] (multiple letters)

Annals of Emergency Medicine

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 550-551

  Riner, R M ^a   Selevan, J ^a   Shesser, R ^a   Smith, J ^a   Holtermann, K ^a   Braun, J ^a   Blanchard, J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC TEST; EMERGENCY WARD; FIRST AID; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; LETTER; MANAGED CARE; MANAGED CARE ORGANIZATION; MEDICAID; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREENING; SYMPTOM; ECONOMICS; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; INSURANCE; MASS SCREENING; NOTE; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; UTILIZATION REVIEW; LEGAL ASPECT; PATIENT ABANDONMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; UNITED STATES;

CONCURRENT REVIEW; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; HUMANS; INSURANCE COVERAGE; MANAGED CARE PROGRAMS; MASS SCREENING; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; MEDICAID; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; REFUSAL TO TREAT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0035343724     PISSN: 01960644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mem.2001.114463     Document Type: Letter

References (1)

1. R Shesser K Holtermann J Smith Results of provider self-adjudication using the prudent layperson standard compared with the managed care organization’s emergency department claim review process Ann Emerg Med 36 2000 212 218