Response shift bias: A problem in evaluating nutrition training using self-report measures

Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 165-170

  Rohs, Frederick R ^a   Langone, Christine A ^a   Coleman, Rhonda K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035343392     PISSN: 14994046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60187-5     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Campbell JP. Personnel training and development. Am Psychol Rev 1971;22:526-602.
2. Cronbach LJ, Furby L. How we should measure "change" - or should we? Psychol Bull 1970;74:68-80.
3. Campbell DT, Stanley JC. Experimental and quasi-experimental design for research and teaching. In: Gage NL, ed. Handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963:171-246.
4. Caporaso JA. Quasi-experimental approaches to social science: perspectives and problems. In: Caporaso JA, Roos LL, eds. Quasi-experimental approaches: testing theory and evaluating policy. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1973:433-92.
5. Neale JM, Leibert RM. Science and behavior: an introduction to research methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
6. Rockwell SK, Kohn H. Post-then pre-evaluation. J Extension 1989;27(2):19-21.
7. Howard GS, Daily PR. Response-shift bias: a source of contamination in self report measures. Appl Psychol 1979;64:144-50.
8. Howard GS, Ralph KM, Gulanick NA, Maxwell SE, Nance DW, Gerber SK. Internal invalidity in pretest/posttest self report evaluations and a re-evaluation of retrospective pre-tests. Appl Psychol Measurement 1979;3:1-23.
9. Pohl NF. Using retrospective pre-ratings to counteract response-shift confounding. J Exp Educ 1982;50:211-4.
10. Sprangers M, Hoogstraten J. Response-style effects, response-shift bias and a bogus pipeline: a replication. Psychol Rep 1988;62:11-6.
11. Rohs FR, Langone CA. Measuring leadership skills development: a comparison of methods. In: Proceedings of the Association of Leadership Educators. Burlington,VT: 1996;7:73-8.
12. Burghardt JA, Devaney BL. Background of The School Nutrition Dietary Assessment Study. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;61:178-81.
13. Pateman BL, McKinney P, Kann L, Small ML. School food service. J Sch Health 1995;65:241-4.
14. SAS Institute. SAS procedures guide, version 608. 5th Ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 1997.