Student/scientist partnerships: A teachers' guide to evaluating the critical components

American Biology Teacher

Volumn 63, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 318-323

  Evans, Celia A ^a,b   Abrams, Eleanor D ^c   Rock, Barrett N ^c   Spencer, Shannon L ^c  

^a PAUL SMITH S COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035343380     PISSN: 00027685     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1662/0002-7685(2001)063[0318:ssp]2.0.co;2     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Abrams, E. (1998). Talking and doing science: Important elements in a teaching-for-understanding approach. In J.J. Minstrel, J.S. Wandersee & J.D. Novak (Eds.), Teaching Science for Understanding: A Human Constructivist Approach (pp. 307-323). San Francisco: Academic Press.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford Press.
3. Barstow, D. (1997). The richness of two cultures. National Conference on Student and Scientist Partnerships: Conference Report. Cambridge, MA: TERC. pp. 33-37.
4. Berkowitz, A.R. (1997). A simple framework for considering the benefits of SSPs. National Conference on Student and Scientist Partnerships: Conference Report. Cambridge, MA: TERC. pp. 38-41.
5. Gunston, R.F. & Mitchell, I.J. (1998). Metacognition and conceptual change. In J.J. Minstrel, J.S. Wandersee & J.D. Novak (Eds.), Teaching Science for Understanding: A Human Constructivist Approach (pp. 133-163). San Francisco: Academic Press.
6. Krajicik, J.S., Blumenfeld, P.C., Marx, R.W. & Soloway, E. (1994). A collaborative model for helping middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 94, 499-515.
7. Lawless, J.G & Rock, B.N. (1998). Student scientist partnerships and data quality. Journal of Science Education Technology, 7(1), 5-13.
8. Miller, J.R., Wu, J., Boyer M.G., Belanger M. & Hare E.W. (1991). Seasonal patterns in leaf reflectance red edge characteristics. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 12, 1509-1524.
9. th Annual International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS). Helsinki, Finland, June 3-6, 1991.
10. Moss, D.M., Abrams, E.D. & Kull, J.A. (1998). Can we be scientists too? Secondary students' perceptions of scientific research from a project-based classroom. Journal of Science Education Technology, 7(2), 149-161.
11. Mullis, I. & Jenkins, K. (1988). The Science Report Card: Elements of Risk and Recovery (Rep. No. 175-01). Princeton, NJ: Author.
12. National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: Academic Press.
13. Theisen, A.F., Rock, B.N. & Eckert, R.T. (1994). Detection of changes in steady-state chlorophyll fluorescence in Pinus strobus following short-term ozone exposure. Journal of Plant Physiology, 144, 410-419.
14. Tinker, R. (1997). Potential of student and scientist partnerships. National Conference on Student and Scientist Partnerships: Conference Report. Cambridge, MA: TERC. pp. 29-32.
15. Treshow, M. (1986). Tolerance and susceptibility to air pollution, a new direction in sampling strategy: a case study of Pinus strobus L. in Acadia National Park, Maine. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Ecological Aspects of Tree-ring Analysis, August 17-21, Marymount College, Tarrytown, NY. pp. 392-400.
16. Treshow, M. & Anderson, F.K. (1991). Plant Stress from Pollution. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. p. 283.
17. Vogelmann, J.E., Rock, B.N. & Moss, D.M. (1993). Red edge spectral measurements from sugar maple leaves. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 14, 1563-1575.
18. Wormstead, S.J. (1999). Designing Training Materials for Student-Teacher-Scientist Partnerships: A Guide for Scientists. A booklet created according to the results from a thesis submitted to the Graduate School at the University of New Hampshire Department of Natural Resources. p. 11.