Joint damage assessment of framed structures using a neural networks technique

Engineering Structures

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 425-435

  Yun, Chung Bang ^a   Yi, Jin Hak ^a   Bahng, Eun Young ^b  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

^b Dongyang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Data perturbation scheme; Joint damage assessment; Joint fixity factor; Neural networks; Noise injection learning; Substructural identification

Indexed keywords

LEARNING ALGORITHMS; MODAL ANALYSIS; NEURAL NETWORKS; NUMERICAL METHODS; STRUCTURAL FRAMES; JOINTS (STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS); LEARNING SYSTEMS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; STEEL STRUCTURES; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

BEAM-TO-COLUMN CONNECTIONS; DAMAGE IDENTIFICATION; DATA PERTURBATION; JOINT DAMAGES; NOISE INJECTION; NUMERICAL SIMULATION STUDIES; ROTATIONAL STIFFNESS; STEEL FRAME STRUCTURES;

DAMAGE DETECTION; STRUCTURAL FRAMES;

JOINT DAMAGE ASSESSMENT;

EID: 0035342658     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00067-5     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Yuan JX, Wu XM. Identification of the joint structural parameters of machine tool by DDS and FEM. J Eng Ind, ASME 1985;107:64-9.
2. Yang KT, Park YS. Joint structural parameter identification using a subset of frequency response function measurements. Mech Syst Signal Process 1993;7(6):509-30.
3. Yun CB, Yi JH, Bahng EY. Joint damage estimation using neural networks. In: Proceedings of Fifth Pacific Structural Steel Conference, 1998; Seoul, Korea. Korea: Techno Press, 1998:1211-6.
4. Wu X, Ghaboussi J, Garret JH Jr.. Use of neural networks in detection of structural damage. Comput Struct 1992;42(4):649- 59.
5. Szewczyk ZP, Hajela P. Damage detection in structures based on feature-sensitive neural networks. J Comput Civil Eng, ASCE 1994;8(2):163-78.
6. Yun CB, Bahng EY. Substructural identification using neural networks. Comput Struct 2000;77(1):41-52.
7. Matsuoka K. Noise injection into inputs in back-propagation learning. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyber 1992;22(3):436-40.
8. Hölmstrom L, Koistinen P. Using additive noise in back-propagation training. IEEE Trans Neural Net 1992;3(1):24-38.
9. Shin SB. Damage detection and assessment of structural systems from measured response. Ph.D. Dissertation. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1994.
10. Hjelmstad KD, Shin S. Damage detection and assessment of structures from static response. J Eng Mech, ASCE 1997;123(6):568-76.
11. Frye JM, Morris GA. Analysis of flexibly connected steel frames. Can J Civil Eng 1975;2:280-91.
12. Dhillon BS, Abdel-Majid S. Interactive analysis and design of flexibly connected frames. Comput Struct 1990;36(2):189-202.
13. Kawashima S, Fujimoto T. Vibration analysis of frames with semi-rigid connections. Comput Struct 1984;19(1-2):85-92.
14. Ho WMG, Chan SL. Semibifurcation and bifurcation analysis of flexibly connected steel frames. J Struct Eng, ASCE 1991;117(8):2299-319.
15. Eurocode 3: design of steel structures, draft for development. UK, British Standard Institution 1993-1-1. 1992.
16. Kim JT, Stubb N. Model uncertainty impact and damage-detection accuracy in plate girder. J Struct Eng, ASCE 1996;121(10):1409-17.
17. Vapnik VN, Chervonenkis AYA. On the uniform convergence of relative frequencies of events to their probabilities. Theory Prob Applic 1971;16(2):264-80.
18. Press W, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP. Numerical recipes in C-the art of scientific computing. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
19. Ewins DJ. Modal testing: theory and practice. UK: Research Studies Press, 1986.