Analytical redundancy relations for fault detection and isolation in algebraic dynamic systems

Automatica

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 687-699

  Staroswiecki, M ^a   Comtet Varga, G ^a  

^a UNIV LILLE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTUATORS; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; FAILURE ANALYSIS; POLYNOMIALS; REDUNDANCY; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); SENSORS;

FAULT DETECTION; FAULT ISOLATION; NONLINEAR DYNAMIC SYSTEMS; POLYNOMIAL DIFFERENTIAL ALGEBRAIC EQUATIONS;

NONLINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 0035342066     PISSN: 00051098     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0005-1098(01)00005-X     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Buchberger, B. (1985). Gröbner bases: An algorithmic method in polynomial ideal theory. In: N. K. Bose (Ed.), Multidimensional systems theory (pp. 184-232) Dordrecht: Reidel.
2. Chow E.Y., Willsky A.S. Analytical redundancy and the design of robust failure detection systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. AC-29:1984;603-614.
3. Christophe, C., Cocquempot, V., & Staroswiecki, M. (1999). Robust residual generation for the induction motor using elimination theory. Proceedings of the IEEE SDEMPED'99, Gijon, Spain.
4. Cocquempot, V., Cassar, J. Ph., & Staroswiecki, M. (1991). Generation of robust analytic redundancy relations. Proceedings of the European control conference (ECC'91), Grenoble, France.
5. Cocquempot, V., & Christophe, C. (2000). On the equivalence between observer-based and parity space approaches for F.D.I. in non-linear systems. Proceedings of the IFAC safeprocess, Budapest (pp. 232-237).
6. Comtet-Varga, G., Cassar, J. Ph., & Staroswiecki, M. (1997). Analytic redundancy relations for state affine systems. Proceedings of the fourth European control conference (ECC'97), Brussels, Belgium.
7. Comtet-Varga, G., Christophe, C., Cocquempot, V., & Staroswiecki, M. (1999). F.D.I. for the induction motor using elimination theory. Proceedings of the fifth European Control Conference (ECC'99), Karlsruhe, Germany.
8. Cox D., Little J., O'Shea D. Varieties and algorithms. 1992;Springer, New York.
9. David P.J. Interpolation and approximation. 1975;Dover Publications, New York.
10. Dierckx P. Curve and surface fitting with spline. 1993;Clarendon, Oxford, New York.
11. Diop S. Elimination in control theory. Mathematical Control Signals Systems. 4:1991;17-32.
12. Diop, S., & Wang, Y. (1993). Equivalence between algebraic observability and local generic observability. Proceedings of the 32nd IEEE conference on decision and control, San Antonio (pp. 2864-2865).
13. Faugère J.C., Gianni P., Lazard D., Mora T. Efficient computation of Gröbner bases by change of orderings. Journal of Symbolic Computations. 16:1993;329-344.
14. Fliess M. Automatique et corps différentiels. Forum Mathematicum. 1:1989;227-238.
15. Fox L., Parker I.B. Chebyshev polynomials in numerical analysis. 1968;Oxford University Press, London, New York.
16. Frank, P. M. (1993). Advances in observer-based fault diagnosis. Proceedings of the international conference on fault diagnosis (TOOLDIAG'93), Toulouse, France.
17. Gertler J.J., Luo Q. Robust isolable models for failure diagnosis. A.I.Ch.E. Journal. 35(11):1989;1856-1861.
18. Glad, S. T. (1989). Non-linear state space and input-output descriptions using differential polynomials. In J. Descusse, M. Fliess, A. Isidori, & D. Leborgne (Eds.), New trends in nonlinear control theory, Lecture notes in control and information science, vol. 122 (pp. 182-189). Berlin: Springer.
19. Guernez, C., Cassar, J. Ph., & Staroswiecki, M. (1997). Extension of the parity space to non-linear polynomial dynamic systems. Proceedings of the IFAC Safeprocess '97, Hull.
20. Hammouri H., Kinnaert M., El Yaagoubi E.H. Observer based approach to fault detection and isolation for non linear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 44:1999;10.
21. Kaboré, P., Staroswiecki, M., & Wang, H. (1999)c. On parity space and observer-based approaches for FDI in state-affine systems. In Proceedings of the 38th IEEE conference on decision and control, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
22. Lelong-Ferrand, J., & Armandiès, J.M. (1978). Cours de Mathématiques, Tome 1, Algèbre. Paris: Dunod Université.
23. Ljung L., Glad S.T. On global identifiability for arbitrary model parameterizations. Automatica. 30:1994;265-276.
24. Magni J.F., Mouyon Ph. On residual generation by observer and parity space approaches. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 39(7):1994;441-447.
25. Patton, R. J. (1994). Robust model based fault diagnosis: The state of the art. Proceedings of the IFAC Safeprocess'94, Helsinki, Finland.
26. Seidenberg A. An elimination theory for differential algebra. University of California Publication Mathematics. 3:1956;31-65.
27. Seliger, R., & Frank, P. M. (1991). Fault diagnosis by disturbance decoupled non-linear observers. Proceedings of the 30th IEEE conference on decision and control, Brighton (pp. 2248-2253).
28. Shumsky, A. (2000). Continuous-time parity relation method for fault diagnosis in non-linear uncertain systems. Proceedings of the IFAC safeprocess, Budapest (pp. 998-1003).
29. Yu, D. N., & Shields, D. N. (1995). Fault diagnosis in bi-linear systemsA survey. Proceedings of the third European control conference, Rome (pp. 360-366).
30. Yu, D. N., Williams, D., Shields, D. N., & Gomm, J. B. (1995). A parity space method of fault detection for bi-linear systems. Proceedings of the American control conference, Seattle (pp. 1132-1133).
31. Zhang Q., Basseville M., Benveniste A. Fault detection and isolation in nonlinear dynamic systems. A combined input-output and local approach Automatica. 34(11):1998;1359-1374.