The differences between retrospective and concurrent protocols in revealing the process-oriented aspects of the design process

Design Studies

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 283-295

  Gero, John S ^a   Tang, Hsien Hui ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Case study; Design cognition; Protocol studies

Indexed keywords

CONCURRENT ENGINEERING; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; PROCESS ENGINEERING; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

DESIGN COGNITION; RETROSPECTIVE PROTOCOLS;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 0035341926     PISSN: 0142694X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0142-694X(00)00030-2     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ericsson K.A., Simon H.A. Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. 1993;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. van Someren M.W., Barnard Y.F., Sandberg C. The think aloud method: a practical guide to modelling cognitive processes. 1994;London, Academic Press.
3. Cross N., Christiaans H., Dorst K. Analysing design activity. 1996;John Wiley, Chichester, UK.
4. Dorst K., Dijkhuis J. Comparing paradigms for describing design activity. Design Studies. Vol 16:1995;261-274.
5. Simon H.A. Sciences of the artificial. 1992;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. Schön D.A. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. 1995;Arena, London.
7. Lloyd P., Lawson B., Scott P. Can concurrent verbalization reveal design cognition? Design Studies. Vol 16:1995;237-259.
8. Suwa M., Purcell T., Gero J.S. Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers' cognitive actions. Design Studies. Vol 19:1988;455-483.
9. Gero J.S., McNeill T An approach to the analysis of design protocols. Design Studies. Vol 19:1998;21-61.
10. Suwa M., Tversky B. What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis. Design Studies. Vol 18:1997;385-403.
11. Larkin J., Simon H.A. Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words? Cognitive Science. Vol 11:1987;65-99.
12. McNeill T., Gero J.S., Warren J. Understanding conceptual electronic design using protocol analysis. Research in Engineering Design. Vol 10:1998;129-140.
13. Goldschmidt G. The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal. Vol 4:1991;123-143.
14. Darke J. The primary generator and the design process. Rogers W.E., Ittelson W.H. New directions in environmental design research. Proceedings of EDRA 9, Washington. 1978;325-337.
15. Gero J.S., Tham K.W., Lee H.S. Behaviour: a link between function and structure in design in D.C. Brown D.C., Waldron M.B., Yoshikawa H. Intelligent computer aided design. 1992;193-225 Amsterdam, North-Holland.
16. Berry D.C., Broadbent D.E. On the relationship between task performance and associated verbalizable knowledge. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Vol 36A:1984;209-231.