Using critical path analysis to model multimodal human-computer interaction

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 613-636

  Baber, Chris ^a   Mellor, Brian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b DEFENCE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Critical path analysis; Multimodal HCI; Transaction time; User models

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER WORKSTATIONS; CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RESPONSE TIME (COMPUTER SYSTEMS);

MULTIMODAL HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; TRANSACTION TIME; USER MODELS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 0035323957     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.2000.0452     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ainsworth, W. (1988). Optimization of string length for spoken digit input with error correction. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 28, 573-581.
2. Baber, C. (1997) Beyond the Desktop: Designing and Using Interaction Devices. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3. Baber, C. & Hone, K.S. (1993). Modelling error recovery and repair in automatic speech recognition. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 39, 495-515.
4. Baber, C., Mellor, B., Graham, R., Noyes, J. M. & Tunley, C. (1996). Workload and the use of automatic speech recognition: the effects of time and resource demands. Speech Communication, 20, 37-55.
5. Biermann, A. W., Fineman, L. & Heidlage, J. F. (1992). A voice and touch driven natural language editor and its performance. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 37, 1-21.
6. Bolt, R. A. (1980). Put-that-there: voice and gesture at the graphics interface. Computer Graphics, 14, 262-270.
7. Bolt, R. A. (1984). The Human Interface: Where People and Computers Meet. Boston: Lifelong Learning Publications.
8. Bourguet, M-L. & Ando, A. (1997). Speech timing prediction in multimodal human-computer interaction In S. Howard, J. Hammond & G. Lindgaard, Eds. INTERACT'97, pp. 453-460. London: Chapman & Hall.
9. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P. & Newell, A. (1980). The keystroke level model for user performance time with interactive systems. Communications of the ACM, 23, 396-410.
10. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P. & Newell, A. (1983). The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
11. Cohen, P. R., Dalrymple, M., Moran, D. B., Pereira, F. C. N., Sullivan, J. W., Gargan, R. A., Schlossberg, J. L. & Sherman, W. T. (1989). Synergetic use of direct manipulation and natural language CHI'89, pp. 227-233. New York: ACM.
12. Diaper, D. (1989). Task Analysis and Human Computer Interaction. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.
13. Eberts, R. E. (1994). User Interface Design Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
14. Ehrenstein, A., Schweickert, R., Choi, S. & Proctor, R. W. (1997). Scheduling processes in working memory: instructions control the order of memory search and mental arithmetic. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 766-802.
15. Graham, R. & Baber, C. (1993). User stress in ASR. In E. J. Lovesey, Ed. Contemporary Ergonomics 1993, pp. 463-469. London: Taylor & Francis.
16. Gray, W. D., John, B. E. & Atwood, M. E. (1993). Project Ernestine: validating a GOMS analysis for predicting and explaining real-world performance. Human-Computer Interaction, 8, 237-309.
17. Greif, S. & Geziga, G. (1987). A critique and empirical investigation of the 'one-best-way' models in human-computer interaction. In M. Frese, E. Ulich & W. Dzida, Eds. Psychological Issues of Human-Computer Interaction in the Workplace, pp. 357-377. Amsterdam: North Holland.
18. Harrison, A. (1997). A Survival Guide to Critical Path Analysis. London: Butterworth-Heinemann.
19. Hauptmann, A. G. & McAvinney, P. (1993). Gestures with speech for graphic manipulation. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38, 231-249.
20. Hone, K. S. & Baber, C. (1999). Modelling the effect of constraint on speech-based human computer interaction. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 50, 85-105.
21. ILO (1989). Work Study. Geneva: International labor Office.
22. John, B. A. & Newell, A. (1990). Toward an engineering model of stimulus-response compatibility. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve, Eds. Stimulus-Response Compatibility, pp. 427-479. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
23. Johnson, P. (1992). Human-Computer Interaction: Psychology, Task Analysis and Software Engineering. London: McGraw-Hill.
24. Kantowitz, B. H. (1974). Double stimulation. In B. H. Kantowitz, Ed. Human Information Processing: Tutorials in Performance and Human Cognition, pp. 83-132. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
25. Kieras, D. & Polson, P. G. (1986). An approach to the formal analysis of user complexity. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 22, 365-394.
26. Lawrence, D., Atwood, M. E., Dews, S. & Turner, T. (1995). Social interaction in the use and design of a workstation: two contexts of interaction. In P. J. Thomas, Ed. The Social and Interactional Dimensions of Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 2406-260. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Liao, J. & Milgram, P. (1991). On validating human performance simulation models. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th. Annual Meeting pp. 1260-1264. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
28. Lockyer, K. & Gordon, J. (1991). Critical Path Analysis and Other Project Network Techniques. London: Pitman.
29. MacKenzie, I. S. (1992). Fitt's law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human Computer Interaction, 7, 91-139.
30. MacKenzie, I. A., Sellen, A. & Buxton, W. (1991). A comparison of input devices in elemental pointing and dragging tasks. Proceedings of the CHI'91, pp. 161-166. New York: ACM.
31. Martin, G. L. (1989). The utility of speech input for user computer interfaces. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 30, 355-375.
32. Mellor, B. A. & O'Connor, C. (1995). User adaptation to voice input interfaces. Proceedings of the ESCA Workshop on Spoken Dialogue Systems, European Speech Communication Association: Lisbon.
33. Mellor, B. A., Tomlinson, M. & Cloeman, N. (1995). The Generic User Interface Design Environment (GUIDE)-overview and features. Proceedings of the ESCA Workshop on Spoken Dialogue Systems, European Speech Communication Association, Lisbon.
34. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
35. Nigay, L. & Coutez, J. (1993). A design space for multimodal interfaces: concurrent processing and data fusion. Proceedings of the InterCHI'93, pp/ 172-178. Amsterdam: IOS.
36. Olson, J. R. & Nielsen, E. (1988). Analysis of the cognition involved in spreadsheet software interaction. Human Computer Interaction 3, 309-350.
37. Olson, J. R. & Olson, G. M. (1990). The growth of cognitive modelling in human-computer interaction since GOMS Human-Computer Interaction, 3, 309-350.
38. Oviatt, S., Deangelli, A. & Kuhn, K. (1997). Integration and synchronization of input modes during multimodal human-computer interaction. Proceedings of the CHI'97, pp. 415-422. New York: ACM.
39. Rudnicky, A. I. & Hauptmann, A. G. (1991). Models for evaluating interaction protocols in speech recognition. Proceedings of the CHI'91, pp. 285-291. New York: ACM.
40. Schmandt, C., Hindus, D., Ackerman, M. S. & Manandhar, S. (1990). Observations of using speech input for window management. In D. Diaper, D. Gilmore, C. Cockton & B. Shackel, Eds. Proceedings of the Interact'90, pp. 787-793. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
41. Schweickert, R. (1978). A critical path generalization of the additive factor method: analysis of a Stroop task. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 18, 105-139.
42. Schweickert, R. (1980). Critical path scheduling of mental processes in dual tasks. Science, 209, 704-706.
43. Schweickert, R. (1983). Latent network theory: scheduling processes in sentence verification and the Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 9, 353-383.
44. Thomas, P. J. (1995). The Social and Interactional Dimensions of Human-Computer Interaction Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Thorisson, K. R., Koons, D. R. & Bolt, R. A. (1992). Multimodal natural dialogue. Proceedings of the CHI'92, pp. 653-654. New York: ACM.
46. Weiner, D. & Ganapathy, S. K. (1989). A synthetic visual environment with hand gesturing and voice input. Proceedings of the CHI'89, pp. 235-240. New York: ACM.