Magnetic Thomas-Fermi-Weizsäcker model for quantum dots: A comparison with Kohn-Sham ground states

European Physical Journal D

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 77-81

  Serra, Ll ^a   Puente, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT DE LES ILLES BALEARS   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY; GROUND STATE; KINETICS; NANOCRYSTALS; SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOTS;

DENSITY-FUNCTIONAL-THEORY; GROUND-STATE DENSITY; GROUND-STATE ENERGIES; KOHN SHAMS; MAGNETIC EXTENSION; SEMICLASSICAL METHODS; THOMAS-FERMI; TWO-DIMENSIONAL QUANTUM DOTS;

KINETIC ENERGY;

EID: 0035318040     PISSN: 14346060     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s100530170237     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. P.L. McEuen, E.B. Foxman, J. Kinaret, U. Meirav, M.A. Kastner, N.S. Windgreen, S.J. Wind. Phys. Rev. B 45, 11419 (1992).
2. I.K. Marmokos, C.W. Beenaker, Phys. Rev. B 46. 15562 (1992).
3. E.H. Lieb, J.P. Solovej, J. Ingvason, Phys. Rev. B 51, 10646 (1995).
4. N. Barberan, Phys. Rev. B 58, 12970 (1998).
5. E. Zaremba, Phys. Rev. B 53, 10512 (1996); E. Zaremba, H.C. Tso, Phys. Rev. B 49, 8147 (1994); B.P. van Zyl, E. Zaremba, D.A.W. Hutchinson, Phys. Rev. B 61, 2107 (2000).
6. E. Zaremba, Phys. Rev. B 53, 10512 (1996); E. Zaremba, H.C. Tso, Phys. Rev. B 49, 8147 (1994); B.P. van Zyl, E. Zaremba, D.A.W. Hutchinson, Phys. Rev. B 61, 2107 (2000).
7. E. Zaremba, Phys. Rev. B 53, 10512 (1996); E. Zaremba, H.C. Tso, Phys. Rev. B 49, 8147 (1994); B.P. van Zyl, E. Zaremba, D.A.W. Hutchinson, Phys. Rev. B 61, 2107 (2000).
8. R. Pino, Eur. Phys. J. B 13, 723 (2000).
9. A. Puente, M. Casas, Ll. Serra, Physica E 8, 387 (2000).
10. K. Bollweg et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2774 (1996); see also comment, T. Darnhoffer, M. Suhrke, U. Rössler. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2593 (1996); reply, Bollweg et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2594 (1996).
11. K. Bollweg et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2774 (1996); see also comment, T. Darnhoffer, M. Suhrke, U. Rössler. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2593 (1996); reply, Bollweg et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2594 (1996).
12. K. Bollweg et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2774 (1996); see also comment, T. Darnhoffer, M. Suhrke, U. Rössler. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2593 (1996); reply, Bollweg et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2594 (1996).
13. 0. For λ small enough the results are not sensitive on its precise value.
14. B. Tanatar, D.M. Ceperley, Phys. Rev. B 39, 5005 (1989).
15. U. von Barth, L. Hedin, J. Phys. C 5, 1629 (1972).
16. M. Koskinen, M. Manninen, S.M. Reimann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1389 (1997).
17. M. Ferconi, G. Vignale, Phys. Rev. B 50, 14722 (1994).
18. S.M. Reimann et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3270 (1999).
19. A. Puente, Ll. Serra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3266 (1999).
20. 0 ≈ 98 Å.
21. s.
22. 2)/2.
23. A.H. McDonald, S.R.E. Yang, M.D. Johnson, Aust. J. Phys. 46, 345 (1993).
24. S.M. Reimann, M. Koskinen, J. Kolehmainen, M. Manninen, D.G. Austing, S. Tarucha, Eur. Phys. J. D 9, 105 (1999).
25. H.-M. Müller, S.E. Koonin, Phys. Rev. B 54, 14532 (1996).