Local government modernisation: The executive and scrutiny model

Political Quarterly

Volumn 72, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 239-245

  Cole, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035315219     PISSN: 00323179     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-923X.00362     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. 1 See e.g. J. Maud, Committee on the Management of Local Government, London, HMSO, 1967; D. Widdecombe, Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Conduct of Local Authority Business, Cmnd 9798, London, HMSO, 1986; N. Rao, 'Representing the People? Testing Assumptions About Local Government Reform', Public Administration, 1999, pp. 257-71.
2. 1 See e.g. J. Maud, Committee on the Management of Local Government, London, HMSO, 1967; D. Widdecombe, Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Conduct of Local Authority Business, Cmnd 9798, London, HMSO, 1986; N. Rao, 'Representing the People? Testing Assumptions About Local Government Reform', Public Administration, 1999, pp. 257-71.
3. 1 See e.g. J. Maud, Committee on the Management of Local Government, London, HMSO, 1967; D. Widdecombe, Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Conduct of Local Authority Business, Cmnd 9798, London, HMSO, 1986; N. Rao, 'Representing the People? Testing Assumptions About Local Government Reform', Public Administration, 1999, pp. 257-71.
4. 2 See e.g. J. Stewart et al., Practical Implications: New Forms of Political Executive, London, Local Government Management Board and the Local Government Association, 1998; S. Charteris and P. Corrigan, Starting to Modernise: Developing Your Council's Scrutiny Role, A Practical Guide, York, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 1999;
5. 2 See e.g. J. Stewart et al., Practical Implications: New Forms of Political Executive, London, Local Government Management Board and the Local Government Association, 1998; S. Charteris and P. Corrigan, Starting to Modernise: Developing Your Council's Scrutiny Role, A Practical Guide, York, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 1999;
6. C. Copus, 'The Party Group: A Barrier to Democratic Renewal', Local Government Studies, 1999, pp. 76-97; Rao, 'Representing the People?'.
7. C. Copus, 'The Party Group: A Barrier to Democratic Renewal', Local Government Studies, 1999, pp. 76-97; Rao, 'Representing the People?'.
8. 3 P. Lashmar, 'Ministers Face Backlash over Plans to Introduce Cabinet-Style Government for Local Councils', Independent, 15 March 2000, p. 10.
9. 4 Draft Executive Arrangements (Decisions, Documents and Meetings) (England) Regulations, London, HMSO, 2000.
10. 5 See e.g. M. S. Cole, 'The "Modernisation" of UK Local Government: An Evaluation of the Executive, Scrutiny and Partnership Reforms at Devon County Council', paper presented to the Political Studies Association of Ireland Annual Conference, Cork, October 2000.
11. 6 Improvement and Development Agency, Shepway District Council Review, London, IDeA, 1999, p. 10; Improvement and Development Agency, London Borough of Newham Review, London, IDeA, 2000, p. 10.
12. 6 Improvement and Development Agency, Shepway District Council Review, London, IDeA, 1999, p. 10; Improvement and Development Agency, London Borough of Newham Review, London, IDeA, 2000, p. 10.
13. 7 Rao, 'Representing the People?', p. 267; Improvement and Development Agency, London Borough of Enfield Review, London, IDeA, 2000, p. 11; Improvement and Development Agency, North Hertfordshire District Council Review, London, IDeA, 2000, p. 9; Improvement and Development Agency, Norfolk County Council Review, London, IDeA, 2000, p. 19.
14. 7 Rao, 'Representing the People?', p. 267; Improvement and Development Agency, London Borough of Enfield Review, London, IDeA, 2000, p. 11; Improvement and Development Agency, North Hertfordshire District Council Review, London, IDeA, 2000, p. 9; Improvement and Development Agency, Norfolk County Council Review, London, IDeA, 2000, p. 19.
15. 7 Rao, 'Representing the People?', p. 267; Improvement and Development Agency, London Borough of Enfield Review, London, IDeA, 2000, p. 11; Improvement and Development Agency, North Hertfordshire District Council Review, London, IDeA, 2000, p. 9; Improvement and Development Agency, Norfolk County Council Review, London, IDeA, 2000, p. 19.
16. 7 Rao, 'Representing the People?', p. 267; Improvement and Development Agency, London Borough of Enfield Review, London, IDeA, 2000, p. 11; Improvement and Development Agency, North Hertfordshire District Council Review, London, IDeA, 2000, p. 9; Improvement and Development Agency, Norfolk County Council Review, London, IDeA, 2000, p. 19.
17. 8 Improvement and Development Agency, Bury Metropolitan Council Review, London, IDeA, 1999, p. 12.
18. 9 Improvement and Development Agency, London Borough of Greenwich Review, London, IDeA, 2000, p. 11.
19. 10 Rao, 'Representing the People?', p. 267.
20. 11 Improvement and Development Agency, London Borough of Enfield Review, London, IDeA, 2000, p. 11.
21. 12 J. Barren, G. Crawley and T. Wood, Councillors in Crisis: The Public and Private Worlds of Local Councillors, London, Macmillan, 1991, pp. 159-60.
22. 13 Copus, 'The Party Group', p. 94.
23. 14 See e.g. N. Rao, 'Representing the People?'