Negotiated environmental and occupational health and safety agreements in the United States: Lessons for policy

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 99-120

  Ashford, Nicholas A ^a   Caldart, Charles C ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; HEALTH RISKS; OCCUPATIONAL RISKS; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE;

NEGOTIATED RULE MAKING;

PRODUCTION ENGINEERING;

EID: 0035314173     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00062-7     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Coglianese C. Assessing consensus: the promise and performance of negotiated rulemaking 46 Duke LJ, 1997.
2. Perritt H. Jr. Negotiated rulemaking before federal agencies: evaluation of recommendations by the administrative conference of the United States. Georgetown Law J. 74:1986;1625-1682.
3. Congress of the United States. Office of technology assessment, gauging control technology and regulatory impacts in occupational safety and health - an appraisal of OSHA's analytic approach, OTA-ENV-635. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, September 1995.
4. Ashford N., Caldart C. Technology, law, and the working environment. 1997;Island Press.
5. Ashford N. Government regulation of occupational health and safety, in occupational health: recognizing and preventing work-related disease. 3rd edition, Boston: Little Brown, 1999 (in press).
6. Ashford N., Ayers C., Stone R. Using regulation to change the market for innovation. Harvard Env. Law Rev. 9(419):1985;443-462.
7. Office of Water, US EPA. Providing waivers from NPDES permit compliance for industrial pollution prevention technology: the industrial pollution prevention project (IP3). Analysis of Sections 301(K) and 307(E) of the Clean Water Act, 1994.
8. Becker M., Ashford N. Exploiting opportunities for pollution prevention in EPA enforcement agreements. Env. Sci. Tech. 29(5):1995;220A-226A.
9. Ashford N, Gobbel J, Lachman J, Matthiesen M, Minzer A, Stone R. The encouragement of technological change for preventing chemical accidents: moving firms from secondary prevention and mitigation to primary prevention. A report to the US Environmental Protection Agency, Center for Technology, Policy and Industrial Development, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, July 1993.
10. United States General Accounting Office. Regulatory reinvention: EPA's common sense initiative needs an improved operating framework and progress measures, July 1997.
11. Goulding A., Murphy J. Regulatory realities: the implementation and impact of industrial environmental regulation. 1998;Earthscan Publications Ltd, London.