|
Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 99-108
|
Comparison of quality assurance for performance and safety characteristics of the facility for Boron Neutron Capture therapy in Petten/NL with medical electron accelerators
a b b c c a a
b
KEMA
(Netherlands)
|
Author keywords
Boron 10 neutron capture therapy; Medical electron accelerators; Neutron dosimetry; Performance characteristics; Quality assurance; Safety characteristics
|
Indexed keywords
COPPER 63;
COPPER DERIVATIVE;
GOLD;
MANGANESE 55;
MANGANESE DERIVATIVE;
UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DOSE CALCULATION;
ELECTRON ACCELERATOR;
FAST NEUTRON RADIATION;
FOIL;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LINEAR ENERGY TRANSFER;
NEUTRON CAPTURE THERAPY;
NEUTRON DOSIMETRY;
PERFORMANCE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
QUALITY CONTROL;
RADIATION BEAM;
RADIATION DEPTH DOSE;
RADIATION DOSE FRACTIONATION;
RADIATION PROTECTION;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
SAFETY;
ACCELERATION;
BORON NEUTRON CAPTURE THERAPY;
BRAIN NEOPLASMS;
DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, RADIATION;
ELECTRONS;
GLIOMA;
HUMANS;
NETHERLANDS;
PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT;
PROGRAM EVALUATION;
QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE;
RADIATION DOSAGE;
RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;
SAFETY MANAGEMENT;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
|
EID: 0035313850
PISSN: 01678140
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8140(00)00298-X Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (19)
|
References (27)
|