Specificity of microbial α-amylase and amyloglucosidase hydrolysis of methyl amyloses

Starch/Staerke

Volumn 53, Issue 3-4, 2001, Pages 110-120

  Mischnick, Petra ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Enzymic degradation; Methyl amylose; Substituent distribution

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035310297     PISSN: 00389056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1521-379X(200104)53:3/4<110::AID-STAR110>3.0.CO;2-Y     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Y. E. M. van der Burgt, J. Bergsma, I. P. Bleeker, P. J. H. C. Mijland, J. P. Kamerling, and J. F. G. Vliegenthart: Structural studies on methylated starch granules. Starch/Stärke 52 (2000), 40-43.
2. P. A. M. Steeneken and E. Smith: Topochemical effects in the methylation of starch. Carbohydr. Res. 209 (1991), 239-249.
3. P. A. M. Steeneken and A. J. J. Woortman: Substitution pattern in methylated starch as studied by enzymic degradation. Carbohydr. Res. 258 (1994), 207-221.
4. P. Mischnick and G. Kühn: Model studies on methyl amyloses: correlation between reaction conditions and primary structure. Carbohydr. Res. 290 (1996), 199-207.
5. P. Mischnick: Habilitation Thesis, University of Hamburg, 1996.
6. O. Wilke and P. Mischnick: Determination of the substitution pattern of cationic starch ethers. Starch/Stärke 49 (1997), 453-458.
7. Y. E. M. van der Burgt, J. Bergsma, I. P. Bleeker, P. J. H. C. Mijland, A. van der Kerk-van Hoof, J. P. Kamerling, and J. F. G. Vliegenthart: Distribution of methyl substituents over branched and linear regions in methylated starches. Carbohydr. Res. 312 (1998), 201-208.
8. Y. E. M. van der Burgt, J. Bergsma, I. P. Bleeker, P. J. H. C. Mijland, A. van der Kerk-van Hoof, J. P. Kamerling, and J. F. G. Vliegenthart: Distribution of methyl substituents over crystalline and amorphous domains in methylated starches. Carbohydr. Res. 320 (1999), 100-107.
9. Y. E. M. van der Burgt, J. Bergsma, I. P. Bleeker, P. J. H. C. Mijland, A. van der Kerk-van Hoof, J. P. Kamerling, and J. F. G. Vliegenthart: Distribution of methyl substituents in amylose and amylopectin from methylated potato starches. Carbohydr. Res. 325 (2000), 183-191.
10. S. Richardson, G. S. Nilsson, L. Gorton, and P. Mischnick: Characterisation of the substituent distribution in hydroxypropylated potato starch. Carbohydr. Res. 328 (2000), 365-373.
11. Y. Chan, P. J. Braun, D. French, and J. F. Robyt: Porcine pancreatic α-amylase hydrolysis of hydroxyethylated amylose and specificity of subsite binding. Biochemistry 23 (1984), 5795-5800.
12. Y. Takeda, S. Hizukuri, Y. Ozono, and M. Suetake: Biochim. Biophys. Acta 749 (1983), 302-311.
13. Y. Takeda and S. Hizukuri: Actions of Aspergillus oryzae alpha-amylase, potato phosphorylase, and rabbit muscle phosphorylase a and b on phosphorylated (1 →4)-α-D-glucan. Carbohydr. Res. 153 (1986), 295-307.
14. K. Bock and H. Pedersen: The Substrate Specificity of the Enzyme Amyloglucosidase (AMG). Part I. Deoxy Derivatives. Acta Chem. Scand. Ser. B 41 (1987), 617-628.
15. K. Bock and H. Pedersen: The Substrate Specificity of the Enzyme Amyloglucosidase (AMG). Part II. 6-Substituted Maltose Derivatives. Acta Chem. Scand. Ser. B 42 (1988), 75-85.
16. K. Adelhorst, K. Bock, H. Pedersen, and S. Refin: The Substrate Specificity of the Enzyme Amyloglucosidase (AMG). Part III. Synthesis of Epimers and Mono-O-methyl Ethers of Methyl-β-Maltoside. Acta Chem. Scand. Ser. B 42 (1988), 196-201.
17. D. P. Sweet. R. H. Shapiro, and P. Albersheim: Quantitative analysis by various g.l.c. response-factors theories for partially methylated and partially ethylated alditol acetates. Carbohydr. Res. 40 (1975), 217-225.
18. P. Mischnick and C. Hennig: A new model for the substitution patterns in the polymer chain of polysaccharide derivatives. Biomacromolecules, in press.
19. 13C-NMR spectra of hydrolyzed and methanolyzed methyl celluloses: monomer composition and models for their description. Carbohydr. Res. 157 (1986), 201-203.
20. P. W. J. Arisz, H. J. J. Kauw, and J. J. Boon: Substituent distribution along the polymer backbone in O-methylcelluloses using GC and FAB-MS for monomer and oligomer analysis. Carbohydr. Res. 271 (1995), 1-14.
21. P. Mischnick, J. Heinrich, and M. Gohdes: Möglichkeiten massenspektrometrischer Methoden in der Analytik von Cellulosederivaten. Das Papier 53 (1999), 739-743.
22. M. Yoshida, T. Yamashita, J. Matsuo, and T. Kishikawa: Enzymic degradation of hydroxyethyl starch, Part I. Influence of the distribution of hydroxyethyl groups on the enzymic degradation of hydroxyethyl starch. Stärke 25 (1973), 373-376 and references 13-15 cited herein.
23. M. Yoshida and T. Kishikawa: A study of hydroxyethyl starch, Part II. Degradation-sites of hydroxyethyl starch by pig pancreas α-amylase. Starch/Stärke 36 (1984), 167-169.
24. H. M. Spurlin: Arrangement of substituents in cellulose derivatives. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 31 (1939), 2222-2227.