Modeling science teaching on science practice? Painting a more accurate picture through an ethnographic lab study

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 387-407

  Buxton, Cory A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035307362     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.1011     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Anyon, J. (1980). Social class and the hidden curriculum of work. Journal of Education, 162, 67-92.
2. Barab, S.A., & Hay, K.E. (2001). Doing science at the elbows of experts: Issues related to the science apprenticeship camp. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 70-102.
3. Coy, M.W. (1989). Apprenticeship: From theory to method and back again. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
4. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research in teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), The handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
5. Graue, M.E., & Walsh, D.J. (1988). Studying children in context: Theories, methods and ethics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Haraway, D. (1989). Primate visions, New York: Routledge.
7. Harding, S. (1989). Can there be a feminist method? In N. Tuana (Ed.), Feminism and science (pp. 17-32). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
8. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
9. Hay, K.E., & Barab, S.A. (1998, May). Electronic performance support system: Supporting science apprenticeships. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
10. Holland, D., & Eisenhart, M. (1990). Educated in romance: Women, achievement and college culture. Chicago, IL; University of Chicago Press.
11. Kelly, G., Carlsen, W., & Cunningham, C. (1993). Science education in sociocultural context: Perspectives from the sociology of science. Science Education, 77, 207-220.
12. Kleinman, S.S. (1998). Overview of feminist perspectives on the ideology of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 837-844.
13. Kohlstedt, S.G., & Longino, H. (1997). The women, gender and science question: What do research on women in science and research on gender and science have to do with each other? In S.G. Kohlstedt & H. Longino (Eds.), Women, gender and science: New directions (Vol. 12, pp. 3-15). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14. Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15. Levinson, B.A. (1996). Social difference and schooled identity at a Mexican secundaria. In B.A. Levinson, D.E. Foley, & D. Holland (Eds.), The cultural production of the educated person: Critical ethnographies of schooling and local practice (pp. 211-238). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
16. Levinson, B.A., & Holland, D. (1996). The cultural production of the educated person: An introduction. In B.A. Levinson, D.E. Foley, & D. Holland (Eds.), The cultural production of the educated person: Critical ethnographies of schooling and local practice (pp. 1-54). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
17. Longino, H. (1989). Can there be a feminist science? In N. Tuana (Ed.), Feminism and science (pp. 45-57). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
18. Luykx, A. (1996). From indios to profesionales: Stereotypes and student resistance in Bolivian teacher training. In B.A. Levinson, D.E. Foley, & D. Holland (Eds.), The cultural production of the educated person: Critical ethnographies of schooling and local practice (pp. 239-272). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
19. Martin, J.R. (1976). What should we do with a hidden curriculum when we find one? Curriculum Inquiry, 6, 135-151.
20. Merton, R.K. (1942). The normative structure of science. In N.W. Storer (Ed.), The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago, IL.: University of Chicago Press.
21. Mulkay, M. (1976). Norms and ideology in science. Social Science Information, 15, 637-656.
22. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
23. National Science Board. (1999). Preparing our children: Math and science education in the national interest. (Vol. NSB99-31). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
24. National Science Foundation. (1996). Shaping the future: New expectations for undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering and technology. Washington, DC.
25. Resnick, L. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, December, 13-20.
26. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Rutherford, F.J., & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Spindler, G. (1982). Doing the ethnography of schooling: Educational anthropology in action. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
29. Spradley, J. (1979). The ethnographic interview. San Francisco: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
30. Spradley, J. (1980). Participant observation. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
31. Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales from the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.