Research participation and financial inducements

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 54-56

  Resnik, David B ^a  

^a EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; ECONOMICS; ETHICS; FEE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMED CONSENT; MOTIVATION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; RESEARCH SUBJECT; VULNERABLE POPULATION;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

ADULT; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIALS; ETHICS; FEES AND CHARGES; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MOTIVATION; NONTHERAPEUTIC HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; THERAPEUTIC HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;

EID: 0035296648     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/152651601300169112     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Bevan, E., L. Chee, S. McGhee, and T. McInnes. 1993. Patients’ attitudes toward participation in clinical trials. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 35:204-207.
2. Grady, C. 2001. Money for research participation: Does it jeopardize informed consent? American Journal of Bioethics 1(2):40-44.
3. King, N. 1995. Experimental treatment: Oxymoron or respiration? Hastings Center Report 25(4):6-15.
4. Lemmens, T., and C. Elliott. 1999. Guinea pigs on the payroll: The ethics of paying research subjects. Accountability in Research 7:3-20.
5. Macklin, R. 1981. Due and undue inducements: On paying money to research subjects. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research 3(5):1-6.
6. Miller, M. 2000. Phase I cancer trials: A collusion of misunderstanding. Hastings Center Report 30(4):34-42.