Research participation and financial inducements

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 60-61

  Todd, Caroline ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL; ECONOMICS; FEE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMED CONSENT; MOTIVATION; PATERNALISM; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; RESEARCH SUBJECT;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

ADULT; CLINICAL TRIALS; COERCION; FEES AND CHARGES; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MOTIVATION; PATERNALISM; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; RESEARCH SUBJECTS;

EID: 0035296116     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/152651601300169149     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Berlin, I. 1969. Four essays on liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. CIOMS. 1993. International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects.
3. Cohen L. 1999. Where it hurts: Indian material for an ethics of organ transplantation. Daedalus 128(4):135-165.
4. Faden, R. R., and T. L. Beauchamp. 1986. A history and theory of informed consent. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Grady, C. 2001. Money for research participation: Does it jeopardize informed consent? American Journal of Bioethics 1(2):40-44.
6. Macklin, R. 1981. "Due" and "undue" inducements: On paying money to research subjects. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research 3(5):1-6.
7. Radcliffe-Richards, J. 1996. Nepharious goings on: Kidney sales and moral arguments. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21(4): 375-416.
8. Radcliffe-Richards, J. et al. 1998. The case for allowing kidney sales. Lancet 351(9129):1950-1952