Posterior composite restorations in primary molars: An in vivo comparison of three restorative techniques

Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 227-230

  Rastelli, Flávia Pilatti ^a   De Sousa Vieira, Ricardo ^b   Souza Rastelli, Márcio C ^a  

^a Santa Catarina Federal University ^*

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; PRISMA TPH RESIN COMPOSITE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PATHOLOGY; RECURRENT DISEASE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; CHILD; COLOR; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MOLAR; RECURRENCE; RESIN CEMENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS;

EID: 0035295907     PISSN: 10534628     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.25.3.251848tg66583963     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bauer JB, Henson JL. Microleakage. A measure of performance of direct filling material. Oper Dent 9: 2-9, 1984.
2. Ben-Amar AR. The effect of retention grooves on gingival marginal leakage in class II posterior composite resin restorations. J Oral Rehab 15: 325-331, 1988.
3. Barnes IE. The adaptation of composite resins to tooth structure Part I: Introduction and adaptation of composite resins to the unetched enamel cavity wall. Brit Dent J 142: 122-129, 1977.
4. Beetzen MV. Microhardness and porosity of class 2 light cured composite restorations cured with a transparent cone attached to the light curing wand. Oper Dent 18: 103-109, 1993.
5. Buonocore MG. Evaluation of an enamel adhesive to prevent marginal leakage: an in vitro study. J Dent Child 40: 119-124, 1973.
6. Carvalho RM. A review of polymerization contraction. The influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 21: 17-24, 1996.
7. Croll TP, Donly RJ. Dentin and enamel-bonded class V composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 23: 465-469, 1992.
8. Al-Hamadami R, Crabb HS. Marginal adaptation of composite resin restorations as indicated by a tracer dye. J Prosth Dent 34: 435-439, 1975.
9. Cheung GSP. An in vitro evaluation of five dentinal adhesives in posterior restorations. Quintessence Int 21: 513-516, 1990.
10. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 30: 347-538, 1980.
11. Pavarini A, Vorio AZ, Cunha EV. Considerações sobre o emprego de resinas compostas para dentes decfduos posteriores. Rev Bras Odontol 49: 18-23, 1992.
12. Araujo FB. Tratamento restaurador das lesões de cárie. In: Toledo AO. Odontopediatria : fundamentos para a prática clínica. 175-222, 1986.
13. Cunha RF. A thirty months clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin in primary teeth. J Clin Red Dent 24: 113-115, 2000.
14. Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of a posterior composite in class II restorations in primary molars: re-year results. Acta Odontol Pediat 5: 9-11, 1984.
15. Oldenburg TR, Vann Jr WF, Dilley LC. Composite restorations for primary molars : two-year results. Pediatr Dent 7: 96-103, 1985.
16. Nelson GV. Osbone JW, Gale EN. A three-year clinical evaluation of composite resin and a high cooper amalgam in posterior primary teeth. J Dent Child 47: 414-418, 1980.
17. Baharlood, Moore DR. Effect of acid etching on marginal penetration of composite resin restorations J Prosth Dent 32: 152-156, 1974.
18. Bowen RR, Nenoto K, Rapson JE. Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth: tissues forces developing in composite materials hardning. J Amer Dent Assoc 34: 849- 953, 1983.
19. Vaprio M. Warfivinge J, Noren J G. Proximo-oclusal composite restorations in primary molars: marginal adaptation, bacterial penetration and pulpal reactions. Acta Odontol Scand 48: 161-167, 1990.
20. George LA, Richards ND, Eich Miller FC. Reduction of marginal gaps in composite restorations by use of glass-ceramics inserts. Oper Dent 20: 151-154, 1995
21. Ferrari M, Mason PN, Butelli E. A new dentinal bonding agent and microfilled resin system: a 2 year clinical report. Quintessence Int 21.875-981, 1990.
22. Triandan H. When in microleakage a real problem? Open Dent 12: 153-157, 1987.
23. White KG Pulpal response to adhesive resin system applied to acid etched vital dentin. Damp versus dry primer application. Quintessence Int 25: 259-268, 1994.