|
|
Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 59-62
|
|
Do we need to reappraise our method of interpreting the ankle brachial pressure index?
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGED;
ANKLE;
ARTICLE;
BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT;
BRACHIAL ARTERY;
DOPPLER FLOWMETRY;
ECHOGRAPHY;
EXERCISE TEST;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
INTERMITTENT CLAUDICATION;
LEG;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
MIDDLE AGED;
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;
PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE;
PHYSIOLOGY;
PRESSURE;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
REFERENCE VALUE;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SYSTOLE;
UNITED KINGDOM;
VASCULARIZATION;
ADULT;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
ANKLE;
BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION;
BRACHIAL ARTERY;
EXERCISE TEST;
FEMALE;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HUMANS;
INTERMITTENT CLAUDICATION;
LEG;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES;
PRESSURE;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
REFERENCE VALUES;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SYSTOLE;
ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER;
|
|
EID: 0035295770
PISSN: 09690700
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2001.10.3.26065 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (21)
|
|
References (0)
|
