Balloon-Type Versus Non-Balloon-Type Replacement Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy: Which Is Better?

Gastroenterology Nursing

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 58-63

  Heiser, Mary ^a   Malaty, Hoda ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CELLULITIS; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; ERYTHEMA; GASTROSCOPY; GASTROSTOMY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSING; PATIENT SELECTION; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TIME; WOUND INFECTION;

ADULT; CELLULITIS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; ERYTHEMA; GASTROSCOPY; GASTROSTOMY; HUMANS; MALE; NURSE'S ROLE; PATIENT SELECTION; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; TIME FACTORS; WOUND INFECTION;

EID: 0035295710     PISSN: 1042895X     EISSN: 15389766     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001610-200103000-00003     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Foutsch, P., Haynes, W., Ballapraalu, S., Sanowski, R. (1986). Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): A new procedure comes of age. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 81, 10-15.
2. Jarvis, J., Heiser, M., Schwartz, J. (1988). Surveillance of skin response after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Ostomy/Wound Management, 21, 60-63.
3. Larson, D., Burton, D., Schroeder, K., DiMagno, E. (1987). Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: Indications, success, complications and mortality on 314 consecutive patients. Gastroenterology, 92, 48-52.