Response to special section: "Cloning: Technology, policy, and ethics" (CQ Vol 7, No 2): But what if we feel that cloning is wrong?

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 205-208

  Häyry, Matti ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLONING; DECISION MAKING; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; PUBLIC OPINION; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARD;

GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;

ADULT; CLONING, ORGANISM; ETHICS, MEDICAL; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; PUBLIC OPINION; SOCIAL VALUES;

EID: 0035294719     PISSN: 09631801     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0963180101002122     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Another argument is that cloning is "unnatural" or otherwise "intrinsically immoral." I have examined these arguments with Tuija Takala in Cloning, naturalness, and personhood, in: Thomasma DC, Weisstub DN, Hervé C, eds. Personhood in Health Care, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, in print, and will not return to them here.
2. Devlin P. The Enforcement of Morals (1959). Reprinted (as Morals and the Criminal Law) in: The Enforcement of Morals, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965, 17.
3. See note 2, Devlin 1965, 17.
4. See note 2, Devlin 1965, 9.
5. Executive Summary. Cloning Human Beings: The Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Rockland, Maryland, 1997.