|
Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 82-87
|
A retrospective analysis comparing the costs and cost effectiveness of amlodipine and enalapril in the treatment of hypertension.
a a a a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
AMLODIPINE;
ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT;
ENALAPRIL;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
COST OF ILLNESS;
DRUG COMBINATION;
DRUG COST;
ECONOMICS;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
HYPERTENSION;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
UNITED STATES;
AMLODIPINE;
ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENTS;
COST OF ILLNESS;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
DRUG COSTS;
DRUG THERAPY, COMBINATION;
ENALAPRIL;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
HYPERTENSION;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 0035294437
PISSN: 10965645
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (5)
|
References (0)
|