Field evaluation of repellents containing deet and AI3-37220 against Anopheles koliensis in Papua New Guinea

Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 42-44

  Frances, S P ^a   Cooper, R D ^a   Popat, S ^b   Beebe, N W ^c  

^a AUSTRALIAN ARMY MALARIA INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^b Murray Barracks   (Papua New Guinea)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

1 (3 cyclohexen 1 yl carbonyl) 2 methyl piperidine (AI3 37220); Anopheles koliensis; Deet; Diethylmethylbenzamide; Papua New Guinea; Repellents

Indexed keywords

1 (3 CYCLOHEXEN 1 YLCARBONYL) 2 METHYLPIPERIDINE; 1-(3-CYCLOHEXEN-1-YLCARBONYL)-2-METHYLPIPERIDINE; DIETHYLTOLUAMIDE; INSECT REPELLENT; PIPERIDINE DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; ANIMAL; ANOPHELES; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; INSECT BITE; MALE; PAPUA NEW GUINEA;

ADULT; ANIMALS; ANOPHELES; DEET; HUMANS; INSECT BITES AND STINGS; INSECT REPELLENTS; MALE; PAPUA NEW GUINEA; PIPERIDINES;

EID: 0035294062     PISSN: 8756971X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Abbott WS. 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol 18:265-267.
2. Barnard DR, Posey KH, Smith D, Schreck CE. 1998. Mosquito density, biting rate and cage size effects on repellent tests. Med Vet Entomol 12:39-45.
3. Beebe NW, Saul A. 1995. Discrimination of all members of the Anopheles punctulatus complex by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 53:478-481.
4. Coleman RE, Robert LL, Roberts LW, Glass J, Seeley DC, Laughinghouse A, Perkins PV, Wirtz RA. 1993. Laboratory evaluation of repellents against four anopheline mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) and two phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae). J Med Entomol 30: 499-502.
5. Debboun M, Strickman D, Klein TA, Glass JA, Wylie E, Laughinghouse A, Wirtz RA, Gupta RK. 1999. Laboratory evaluation of AI3-37220, AI3-35765, CIC-4, and deet repellents against three species of mosquitoes. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 15:342-347.
6. Frances SP, Cooper RD, Popat S, Sweeney AW. 1999. Field evaluation of the repellents, deet, CIC-4, and AI3-37220, against Anopheles in Lae, Papua New Guinea. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 15:339-341.
7. Frances SP, Cooper RD, Sweeney AW. 1998. Laboratory and field evaluation of the repellents, deet, CIC-4, and AI3-37220, against Anopheles farauti (Diptera: Culicidae) in Australia. J Med Entomol 35:690-693.
8. Frances SP, Klein TA, Hildebrandt DW, Burge R, Noigamol C, Eikarat N, Sripongsai B, Wirtz RA. 1996. Laboratory and field evaluation of deet, CIC-4 and AI3-37220 against Anopheles dirus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand. J Med Entomol 33:511-515.
9. Gupta RK, Rutledge LC. 1994. Role of repellents in vector control and disease prevention. Am J Trop Med Hyg 50(Suppl):82-86.
10. Khan AA, Maibach HI, Skidmore DL. 1975. Insect repellents: effect of mosquito and repellent-related factors on protection time. J Econ Entomol 68:43-45.
11. Lee DJ, Woodhill AR. 1944. The anopheline mosquitoes of the Australasian region Publication of the University of Sydney, Department of Zoology Monograph 2. Glebe, New South Wales, Australia: Australasian Medical Publishing Co. Ltd.
12. Schreck CE 1977. Techniques for the evaluation of insect repellents: a critical review. Annu Rev Entomol 22:101-119.
13. Travis BV 1950. Known factors causing variations in results of insect repellent tests. Mosq News 10:126-132.
14. Walker TW, Robert LL, Copeland RA, Githeko AI, Wirtz RA, Githure JI, Klein TA. 1996. Field evaluation of arthropod repellents, deet and a piperidine compound, AI3-37220 against Anopheles funestus and Anopheles arabiensis in western Kenya. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 12:172-176.