Hemostatic Tools for the Gastrointestinal Surgeon: Ultrasonic Coagulator vs. Bipolar Ligation

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 216-218

  Fried, Gerald M ^a,b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MONTREAL GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTROCOAGULATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; GASTROENTEROLOGY; HEMOSTASIS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LIGATION; ULTRASOUND;

ELECTROCOAGULATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; GASTROENTEROLOGY; HEMOSTASIS, SURGICAL; HUMANS; LIGATION; ULTRASONICS;

EID: 0035291399     PISSN: 1091255X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1091-255X(01)80036-6     Document Type: Article

References (2)

1. Underwood RA, Dunnegan DL, Soper NJ. Prospective, randomized trial of hipolar electrosurgery vs. ultrasonic coagulation for division of short gastric vessels during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Surg Endosc 1999;13:763-768.
2. Kusunoki M, Shoji Y, Yanagi H, Ikeuchi H, Noda M, Yamamura T, Current trends in restorative proctocolectomy: Introduction of an ultrasonically activated scalpel. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:1349-1352.