Shear strengths of a gallium alloy bonded to human enamel following nine different surface treatments

Dental Materials

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 116-121

  Claire, J ^a   Williams, P T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bonding; Enamel; Gallium; Indium; Shear strength

Indexed keywords

COPPER; DENTAL ALLOY; DISPERSALLOY; GALLIUM; GALLOY; INDIUM; PHOSPHORIC ACID; PUMICE; SILICATE; WATER;

AIR; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; ENAMEL; HUMAN; HUMIDITY; IMMERSION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; THERMODYNAMICS; TIME; ULTRASTRUCTURE; WETTABILITY;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; AIR; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COPPER; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; GALLIUM; HUMANS; HUMIDITY; IMMERSION; INDIUM; MATERIALS TESTING; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; SILICATES; STATISTICS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; THERMODYNAMICS; TIME FACTORS; WATER; WETTABILITY;

EID: 0035290548     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00048-8     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Smith DL, Caul HJ. Alloys of gallium with powdered metals as possible replacement for dental amalgam. J Am Dent Assoc 1956;53:315-24.
2. Waterstrat RM. Evaluation of a gallium-palladium-tin alloy for restorative dentistry. J Am Dental Assoc 1969;78:536-41.
3. Saito C, Fusayama T. Adhesive and sealing properties of gallium alloy. J Dent Res 1975;54:916.
4. Lund MR, Baum R. Indium alloy as a dental restorative material. J Southern Cal Dent Assoc 1967;35:427-35.
5. Whitworth JM, Khan AQ. Marginal leakage of gallium alloy root-end fillings: an in-vitro assessment. Int Endo J 1995;28:194-9.
6. Winkler MM, Moore BK, Rhodes BM, Swartz M. Gallium amalgam verses mercury amalgam: microleakage and retention. J Dent Res 1996;75:38 (Abstract No. 166).
7. Navarro MFL, Franco EB, Bastos PAM, Teixeira LC, Carvalho RM. Clinical evaluation of gallium alloy as a posterior restorative material. Quint Int 1996;27:315-20.
8. Osborne JW, Summitt JB. 2-year clinical evaluation of a gallium restorative alloy. Am J Dent 1996;9:191-4.
9. Blair FM, Whitworth JM, Mcabe JF. The physical properties of a gallium alloy restorative material. Dent Mater 1995;11:277-80.
10. Kidd EAM. Microleakage: a review. J Dent 1976;4:199-205.
11. Ferrari M. Sealing ability of last generation of adhesive-restorative materials placed on vital teeth. Acad Dent Mater Trans 1998;12:75-102.
12. Retief DH. Are adhesive techniques sufficient to prevent microleakage? Oper Dent 1987;12:140-5.
13. Graver H, Trowbridge H, Alperstein K. Microleakage of castings cemented with glass-ionomer cements. Oper Dent 1990;15: 2-9.
14. International Organization for Standardization, 1994. ISO/TR 11405 Dental materials - Guidance on testing of adhesion to tooth structure. Geneva, Switzerland.
15. DeSchepper EJ, Oshida Y, Moore BK, Cook NB, Eggertson H. In vitro corrosion behavior and microstructure examination of a gallium-based restorative. Oper Dent 1997;22:209-16.
16. Wiltshire WA. Shear bond strengths of a glass ionomer for direct bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994;106:127-30.
17. Powis DR, Folleras T, Merson SA, Wilson AD. Improved adhesion of a glass ionomer cement to dentin and enamel. J Dent Res 1982;61:1416-22.