Radiographic digital image enhancement. Part II: Transform domain techniques

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 65-77

  Analoui, M ^a,b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital radiography; Digital radiography, dental; Radiographic image enhancement

Indexed keywords

ARTIFACT; FILTRATION; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ARTIFACTS; FILTRATION; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMANS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL;

EID: 0035287364     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600563     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Jain A. Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc, 1989.
2. Pratt W. Digital Image Processing. New York: Wiley Interscience, 1991.
3. Brigham E. The Fast Fourier Transform. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1988.
4. Rao R, Bopardikar A. Wavelet Transform: Introduction to Theory and Application. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998.
5. Bracewell R. The Fourier Transform and Its Applications. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1965.
6. Proakis J, Manolakis D. Introduction to Digital Signal Processing. New York: Macmillan, 1988.
7. Samei E, Eyler W, Baron L. Effects of Anatomical Structure on Signal Detection. In: Beutel J, Kundel H, van Metter R, (eds). Handbook of Medical Imaging, Vol 1. Physics and Psychophysics. Bellingham, WA: SPIE Press, 2000: pp 655-682.
8. Eckstein M, Whiting J. Lesion detection in structured noise. Acad Radiol 1995; 2: 249-253.
9. Curry III T, Dowdey J, Murry R. Christensen's Physics of Diagnostic Radiology. 4th. edn. Media, PA: Williams & Wilkins, 1990.
10. Janesick J. Charge-Coupled Devices. Bellingham, WA: SPIE Press, 2000.
11. Ruttimann UE, Webber RL. A simple model combining quantum noise and anatomical variation in radiographs. Med Phys 1984; 11: 50-60.
12. Nishikawa RM, Yaffe MJ. Effect of various noise sources on the detective quantum efficiency of phosphor screens. Med Phys 1990; 17: 887-893.
13. Van Metter R, Rabbani M. An application of multivariate moment-generating functions to the analysis of signal and noise propagation in radiographic screen-film systems. Med Phys 1990; 17: 65-71.
14. Gonzalez RC, Wintz P. Digital Image Processing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1992.
15. Andrews H, Hunt B. Digital Image Restoration. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1977.
16. Papoulis A. Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1984.
17. Longbotham H, Bovik A. Theory of order statistic filters and their relationship to linear FIR filters. IEEE Trans Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 1989; 37: 275-287.
18. Bovik A, Huan T, Munson D. A generalization of median filtering using linear combination of ordered statistics. IEEE Trans Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 1983; 31: 1342-1350.
19. Harwood D, Subbarao M, Hakalahti H, Davis L. A new class of edge-preserving smoothing filters. Pattern Recognition Letters 1987; 6: 155-162.
20. Arce G, Foster R. Detail preserving ranked-order based filters for image processing. IEEE Trans Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 1989; 37: 83-98.
21. Nieminen A, Heinonen P, Neuvo Y. A new class of detail-preserving filters for image processing. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal 1987; 9: 74-90.
22. Bernstein R. Adaptive nonlinear filters for simultaneous removal of different kind of noise in images. IEEE Trans Circuits and Systems 1987; CAS-34: 1275-1291.
23. Parks T, Burrus C. Digital Filter Design. John Wiley: New York, 1987.
24. Analoui M. Radiographic image enhancement Part 1: Spatial domain techniques. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 2001; 30: 1-9.