Social identification and gender-related ideology in women and men

British Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 59-77

  Cameron, James E ^a   Lalonde, Richard N ^a  

^a SAINT MARY S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROL; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STUDENT;

ADULT; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMANS; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; MALE; PREJUDICE; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION; SOCIAL VALUES; STUDENTS;

EID: 0035287015     PISSN: 01446665     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/014466601164696     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Abrarns, D. (1989) Differential association: Social developments in gender identity and intergroup relations during adolescence. In S. Skevington & D. Baker (Eds.), The social identity of women (pp. 59-83). London: Sage.
2. Abrams, D., Thomas, J., & Hogg, M. A. (1990). Numerical distinctive-ness, social identity and gender salience. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 87-92.
3. Amancio, L. (1989). Social differentiation between dominant' and 'dominated' groups: Toward an integration of social stereotypes and social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology 19, 1-10.
4. Ashmore, R. D., & Del Boca, F. K. (1986). Toward a social psychology of female-male relations. In R. D. Ashmorc & F. K. Del Boca (Eds.), The social psychology of female-male relations (pp. 1-17). Orlando, FL: Academic Press
5. Breinlinger, S., & Kelly, C. (1994). Women's responses to status inequality: A test of social identity theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 1-16.
6. Brown, R. J., Condor, S., Mathews, A., Wade, G., & Williams, J. (1986). Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 273-286
7. Brown, R., Hinkle, S., Ely, P. G., Fox-Cardamone, L., Maras, P., & Taylor, L. A. (1992). Recognizing group diversity: Individualist-collectivist and autonomous-relational social orientations and their implications for group processes, British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 327-342.
8. Brown, R. J., & Williams, J. (1984). Group identification: The same thing to all people? Human Relations, 17, 347-564.
9. Burian, B. K., Yanico, B. J., & Martinez, C. R., Jr. (1998). Group gender composition effects on judgments of sexual harassment. Psychology of Womnen Quarterly, 33, 463-480.
10. Burns, C., T., Branscombe, N. R., & Klar, Y. (1997). Maladjustment implications of self and group gender-role discrepancies: An ordered-discrepancy model. European Journal of social Psychology, 27 75-93.
11. Cameron, J. E. (2000). A three-factor model of social identity. Manuscript submitted for publication.
12. Cameron, J. E., Sato, T., Lalonde, R. N., & Lay, C. (1997, June). A multidimensional measure of ethnic identification. Paper presented at the meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario.
13. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analyses for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Condor, S. (1986). Sex role beliefs and 'traditional' women: Feminist and intergroup perspectives. In S. Wilkinson (Ed.), Feminist social psychology: Developing theory and practice (pp. 97-118). Milton Kynes: Open University Press.
15. Condor, S. (1989). 'Biting into the future': Social change and the social identity of women. In S. Skevington & D. Baker (Eds.), The social identity of women (pp. 15-39). London: Sage.
16. Converse, P. E. (1970). Attitudes and non-attitudes: Continuation of a dialogue. In E. R. Tufte (Ed.), The quanitative analysis. of social problems (pp. 168-189). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
17. Deaux, K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade's research on gender. American Psychologist. 39, 103-116.
18. Deaux, K. (1996). Social identification. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp.777-798). New York: Guilford Press.
19. Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369-389.
20. F'iske, S. T., amp; Stevens, L. E. (1993). What's so special about sex? Gender stereotyping and discrimination. In S. Oskamp & M. Constanzo (Eds.), Gender issues in contemporary society, (pp. 173-196). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Griffin, C. (1989). 'I'm not a Women's Libber, but. '; Feminism, consciousness and identity. In S. Skevington & D. Baker (Eds.), The social identity of women (pp. 173-193). London: Sage.
23. Gurin, P., & Markus, H. (1989). Cognitive consequences of gender identity. In S. Skevington & D. Baker (Eds.), The social identity of women (pp. 132-172). London: Sage.
24. Gurin, P., & Townsend, A. (1986). Properties of gender identity and their implications for gender consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 139-148.
25. Haddock, G., & Zanna, M. P. (1994). Preferring 'housewives' to 'feminist;': Categorization and the favorability of attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 25-52.
26. Henderson-King, D. H., & Stewart, A. J. (1994). Women or feminists? Assessing women's group consciousness. Sex Roles, 31, 505-516.
27. Henley, N. M., Meng, K., O'Brien, D., McCarthy, W. J., & Sockloskie, R. J. (1998). Developing a scale to measure the diversity of feminist -attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 317-348.
28. Hinkle, S., & Brown, R. J. (1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 48-70). New York: Springer.
29. Hinkle, S., Taylor, L. A., Fox-Cardamone, D. L., & Crook, K. F. (1989). Intragroup identification and intergroup differentiation: A multicomponent approach. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 305-317.
30. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.
31. Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1987). Intergroup behaviour, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 325-340.
32. Hurtig, M. C., & Pichevin, M. F. (1990). Salience of the sex category system in person perception: Contextual variations. Sex Roles, 22, 369-395.
33. Jackson, L. A., Sullivan, L. A., Harnish, R., & Hodge, C. N. (1996). Achieving positive social identity: Social mobility, social creativity, and permeability of group boundaries. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 70, 241-254.
34. Karasawa, M. (1991). Toward an assessment ot social identity: The structure of group identification and its effects on in-group evaluations, British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 293-3(17.
35. Kelly, C. (1988). Inergroup differentiation in a political context. British Journal of Social Psychology, 27?, 319-332.
36. Kelly, C., & Breinlinger, S. (1995). identity and injustice: Exploring women's participation in collective action, Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 5, 41-57.
37. Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
38. Kimmel, M. S. (1987). Men's responses to feminism at the turn ot the century. Gender and Society, 1, 261-283.
39. Kirk, R. E. (1982). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
40. Lalonde, R. N., Schuller, R. A., & Korn, R. (1992). Attitudes toward affirmative action programmes directed at women. Paper presented at the meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Quebec City, Quebec.
41. Lindeman, M. (1997). Ingroup bias, self-enhancement and group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27', 337-355.
42. Lindeman, M., & Sundvik, L. (1995). Evaluative bias and self-enhancement among gender groups. I European Journal of Social Psychology. 25, 269-280.
43. Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1991). Self-stereotyping and self-enhancement in gender groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 403-417.
44. Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A Collective Self-Esteem Scale: Self-evaluation of one's social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302-318.
45. Michael, M. (1990). Intergroup theory and deconstruction. In I. Parker & J. Shotter (Eds.), Deconstructing social psychology (pp. 170-182). London: Routledge.
46. O'Neil J. M., Good, G. E., & Holmes, S. (1995). Fifteen years of theory and research on men's gender role conflict: New paradigms of empirical research. In R. I. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 164-206), New York: Basic Books.
47. Pleck, J. H. (1981). The myth of masculinity. Boston: MIT Press.
48. Pleck, J. H. (1995). The gender role strain paradigm: An update. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 11-32). New York: Basic Books.
49. Reid, P. T. (1988). Racism and sexism: Comparisons and conflicts. In P. A. Katz & D. A. Taylor (Eds.), Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy (pp. 203-221). New York: Plenum.
50. Schiffmann, R., & Wicklund, R. A. (1992). The minimal group paradigm und its minimal psychology: On equating social identity with arbitrary group membership. Theory & Psychology. 2, 29-55.
51. Sherif, C. W. (1982). Needed concepts in the study of gender identity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 6, 375-398.
52. Skevington, S., & Baker, D. (Eds.) (1989). The social identity of women. London: Sage.
53. Spence, J. T., & Hahn, H. D. (1997). The Attitudes Toward Women Scale and attitude change in college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 17-34.
54. Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimension, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.
55. Swim, J. K., Aiken, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices, Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 68, 199-214.
56. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
57. Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation, between social rutipi. London: Academic Press.
58. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In \V. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.). The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA; Brooks-Cole.
59. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of interoup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
60. Thomas, A. (1990)., The significance of gender politics in men's accounts of their 'gender identity'. In J. Hearn & D. Morgan (Eds.), Men, msculinities and social theory (pp. 143-159). London: L'nwm llyman.
61. Williams, J. A. (1984). Gender and intergroup behaviour: towards an integration. British Journal of. Social Psychology, 23, 311-316.
62. Williams, J. A., & Giles, H. (1978). The changing status of women in society: An intergroup perspective. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 431-446). London: Academic Press.