Dual Chamber Rate Responsive Pacing and Chronotropic Insufficiency: Comparison of an Activity Sensor, Respiratory Sensor and a Double Sensor during Exercise and during Normal Everyday Activity;Stimulation double chambre à fréquence asservie et incompétence chronotrope: Comparaison d'un capteur d'activité, de ventilation et d'un double capteur

Archives des Maladies du Coeur et des Vaisseaux

Volumn 94, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 190-195

  Lascault, G ^a   Pansard, Y ^b   Scholl, J M ^a   Abraham, P ^c   Dupuis, J M ^c   Victor, J ^c   Copie, X ^a   Alonso, C ^b   Sarrazin, E ^d  

^a CENTRE CARDIOLOGIQUE DU NORD   (France)

^b BICHAT HOSPITAL   (France)

^c ANGERS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^d Medtronic France ^*  (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; BREATHING; CLINICAL TRIAL; EXERCISE; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; FORWARD HEART FAILURE; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; ARRHYTHMIA; CARDIAC OUTPUT, LOW; DATA COLLECTION; EXERCISE; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL; RESPIRATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0035286917     PISSN: 00039683     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Andersen HR, Thuesen L, Bagger JP, Vesterlund T, Bloch-Thomsen PE. Prospective randomized trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick sinus syndrome. Lancet 1997 ; 350 : 1210-6.
2. Schrepf R, Koller B, Pache J, Hofmann M, Goedel-Meinen L, Schomig A. Results of the randomized prospective DDD vs VVI trial in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (abstract). PACE 1997 ; 20 : 411.
3. Benditt DG, Mianulli M, Fetter J et al. Single-chamber cardiac pacing with activity initiated chronotrpic response: Evaluation by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Circulation 1987 ; 75 : 184-91.
4. Gammage M, Schofield S, Rankin I et al. Benefit of single setting rate responsive ventricular pacing compared with fixed-rate demand pacing in elderly patients. PACE 1991 ; 14 : 174-80.
5. Lau CP, Butrous GS, Ward DE et al. Comparison of exercise performance of six rate-adaptive right ventricular cardiac pacemakers. Am J Cardiol 1989 ; 63 : 833-8.
6. Dreifus LS, Fish C, Griffin JC et al. Guidelines for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmic devices: a report of the ACC/AHA Task Force on assessment of diagnostic and therapeutic cardiovascular procedures. Circulation 1991 ; 84 : 455-67
7. Linde-Edelstam C, Nordlander R, Undén AL et al. Quality of life in patients treated with atrioventricular synchronous pacing compared to rate modulated ventricular pacing: a long term double blind cross-over study. PACE 1992 ; 15 : 1467-76.
8. Rossi P. The best rate-responsive pacemaker: Perspective on ideal rate-responsive pacing. J Electrophysiol 1988 ; 2 : 49-54.
9. Furman S. Rate modulated pacing. Circulation 1990 ; 82 : 1081-91.
10. Alt E, Combs W, Fotuhi P, Bambl E, Wahlstrand J, Willhaus R. Initial clinical experience with new dual sensor SSIR pacemaker controlled by body activity and minute ventilation. PACE 1995 ; 18 : 1487-95.
11. Ovsyshcher I, Guldal M, Karaoguz R, Katz A, Bondy C. Evaluation of a new rate adaptive ventricular pacemaker controlled by double sensors. PACE 1995 ; 18 : 386-90.
12. Landman MAJ, Senden PJ, Van Rooijen H, Van Hemel NM. Initial clinical experience with rate-adaptive cardiac pacing using two sensors simultaneously. PACE 1990 ; 13 : 1615-22.
13. Linde C. How to evaluate quality of life in pacemaker patients: problems and pitfalls. PACE 1996 ; 19 : 391-7.
14. Cowell R, Morris-Thurgood J, Paul V, Ilsley C, Camm AJ. PACE 1993 ; 16 : 1441-4.