Client satisfaction with the nutrition education component of the California WIC program

Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 83-94

  Nestor, Brenda ^a   McKenzie, Jeannie ^a   Hasan, Natoiya ^a   AbuSabha, Rayane ^b   Achterberg, Cheryl ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035285192     PISSN: 14994046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60171-1     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Randall B, Boast L. Holst L. Study of WIC participant and program characteristics, 1994. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates, 1995.
2. Rush D, Leighton J, Sloan NL, Alvir JM, Garbowski GC. The national WIC evaluation: evaluation of the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children. II. Review of past studies of WIC. Am J Clin Nutr 1988;48(Suppl 2):394-411.
3. Rush D, Alvir JM, Kenny DA, Johnson SS, Horvitz DG. The national WIC evaluation: evaluation of the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children. III. Historical study of pregnancy outcomes. Am J Clin Nutr 1988;48(Suppl 2):412-28.
4. Rush D, Sloan NL, Leighton J, Alvir JM, Horvitz DG, Seaver WB, et al. The national WIC evaluation: evaluation of the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children. V. Longitudinal study of pregnant women. Am J Clin Nutr 1988;48(Suppl 2):439-483.
5. Rush D, Leighton J, Sloan NL, Alvir JM, Horvitz DG, Seaver WB, et al. The national WIC evaluation: evaluation of the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children. VI. Study of infants and children. Am J Clin Nutr 1988;48(Suppl 2):484-511.
6. WIC: a success story. 3rd Ed. Washington, DC: Food Research and Action Center, 1991.
7. Owen AL, Owen GM. Twenty years of WIC: a review of some effects of the program. J Am Diet Assoc 1997;97:777-82.
8. Committee on Scientific Evaluation of WIC Nutrition Risk Criteria. WIC nutrition risk criteria: a scientific assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996.
9. U.S. Department of Agriculture. The WIC dynamics study. Vol. 1. Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1995.
10. Novak JD. Learning, creating, and using knowledge: concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998.
11. Training and evaluation of nutrition education for the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) in Califorma. Technical proposal for subcontract. Submitted to the State of California, DHS, the California WIC Program, and the Cooperative Extension Department of Nutrition, University of California at Davis. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University, 1996.
12. Achterberg CL, Shepherd SK. The components and use of qualitative research. In: Monson ER, ed. Research: successful approaches. Chicago: American Dietetic Association, 1992:73-81.
13. U.S. Census Bureau. Revised standards for defining metropolitan areas in the 1990s. Part III. Official standards for metropolitan areas. . Accessed December 12, 1999.
14. AbuSabha R, McKenzie J, Torres D, Achterberg C. Evaluation of nutrition education in a supplemental food and nutrition program in New Mexico. Family Consumer Sci Res J 1998;4:98-104.
15. Krueger RA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1994.
16. Stokes ME, Davis CS, Koch GG. Categorical data analysis: using the SAS system. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc., 1995.
17. Stewart DW, Shamdasani PN. Focus groups: theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1990.
18. Bingham SA. Limitations of the various methods for collecting dietary intake data. Ann Nutr Metab 1991;35:117-27.
19. Shefer A, Mezoff J, Caspari D, Bolton M, Herrick P. What mothers in the women, infants, and children (WIC) program feel about WIC and immunization linkage activities: a summary of focus groups in Wisconsin. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1988;152:65-70.
20. Hamilton CY, Schiller R, Boyne L. Nutrition attitudes, practices, and views of selected Ohio WIC participants. J Am Diet Assoc 1994;94: 899-901.
21. Dodds JM, Ahluwalia I, Magda B. Experiences of families using food assistance and welfare programs in North Carolina: perceived barriers and recommendations for improvement. J Nutr Educ 1996;28: 101-8.
22. Montano DE, Kasprzyk D, Taplin SH. The theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK, eds. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1997:85-112.
23. Hill LA, Harveywebster MJ, Usinger-Lesquereux J, St Jeor ST. The use of voice mail in a nutrition and cancer information telephone service. J Am Diet Assoc 1991;91:347-8.
24. Van Assema P, Brug J, Kok G. Nutrition education interventions in a community setting: 2 Dutch examples. Nutr Health 1997;12:45-54.
25. Ausubel DP, Novak JD, Hanesian H. Educational psychology, a cognitive view. 2nd Ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1978.
26. Novak JD, Gowin DB. Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
27. Achterberg C. Factors that affect learner readiness. J Am Diet Assoc 1988;88:1426-8.