Generation of efficient frontiers in multi-objective optimization problems by generalized data envelopment analysis

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 129, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 586-595

  Yun, Y B ^a   Nakayama, H ^b   Tanino, T ^a   Arakawa, M ^c  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KONAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c KAGAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DATA REDUCTION; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; OPTIMIZATION; PROBLEM SOLVING;

GENERALIZED DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

OPERATIONS RESEARCH;

EID: 0035284181     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00469-5     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. M. Arakawa, H. Nakayama, I. Hagiwara, H. Yamakawa, Multiobjective optimization using adaptive range genetic algorithms with data envelopment analysis, in: A Collection of Technical Papers on Seventh Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization (TP98-4970), AIAA, vol. 3, 1998, pp. 2074-2082.
2. Banker R.D., Charnes A., Cooper W.W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science. 30:1984;1078-1092.
3. C.A. Coello Coello, An updated survey of evolutionary multiobjective optimization techniques: State of art and future trends, in: Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 1999, pp. 3-13.
4. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research. 2:1978;429-444.
5. C.M. Fonseca, P.J. Fleming, Genetic algorithms for multi-objective optimization: Formulation, discussion and generalization, in: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, 1993, pp. 416-426.
6. Goldberg D.E. Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning. 1989;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
7. T.C. Koopmans, Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities, Analysis of Production and Allocation, Wiley, New York, 1951, pp. 33-97.
8. H. Nakayama, Aspiration level approach to interactive multi-objective programming and its applications, in: P.M. Pardolas et al. (Eds.), Advances in Multicriteria Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1995, pp. 147-174.
9. Sawaragi Y., Nakayama H., Tanino T. Theory of Multiobjective Optimization. 1985;Academic Press, New York.
10. J.D. Schaffer, Multiple objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithms, in: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, 1985, pp. 93-100.
11. H. Tamaki, H. Kita, S. Kobayashi, Multi-objective optimization by genetic algorithms: A review, in: Proceedings of the ICEC'96, 1996, pp. 517-522.
12. Tulkens H. On FDH efficiency: Some methodological issues and applications to retail banking, courts, and urban transit. Journal of Productivity Analysis. 4:1993;183-210.
13. Y.B. Yun, H. Nakayama, T. Tanino, A generalization of DEA model, Journal of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers (SICE) 35 (8) (1999) 1813-1818 (in Japanese).