Accentuation boundaries in Dutch, French and Swedish

Speech Communication

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 305-318

  Beaugendre, Frédéric ^a   House, David ^b   Hermes, Dik J ^a  

^a Institute for Perception Research Eindhoven   (Netherlands)

^b ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA STRUCTURES; LINGUISTICS; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH SYNTHESIS;

ACCENTUATION BOUNDARIES;

SPEECH COMMUNICATION;

EID: 0035283627     PISSN: 01676393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6393(00)00062-5     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Beaugendre, F., 1994. Une étude perceptive de l'intonation du français. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Paris XI, Orsay, France.
2. Beckman M., Pierrehumbert J. Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Year book. 3:1986;255-309.
3. Bruce, G., 1977. Swedish Word Accents in Sentence Perspective. Gleerup, Lund, Sweden.
4. Bruce, G., Granström, B., House, D., 1992. Prosodic phrasing in Swedish speech synthesis. In: Bailly, G., Benoit C. (Eds.), Talking Machines: Theories, Models and Designs. Elsevier, North Holland, pp. 113-125.
5. Bruce, G., Granström, B., Gustafson, K., House, D., 1993. Phrasing strategies in prosodic parsing and speech synthesis. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech), Vol. 2, Berlin, pp. 1205-1208.
6. Caspers, J., 1994. Pitch movements under time pressure. Effects of speech rate on the melodic marking of accents and boundaries in Dutch. Dissertation series no. 10, Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics, Holland Academic Graphics, The Hague.
7. Collier, R., 1970. The optimum position of prominence lending pitch rises. IPO Annual Progress Report 5, Eindhoven, pp. 82-85.
8. Hamon, C., Moulines, E., Charpentier, F., 1989. A diphone synthesis system based on time-domain prosodic modifications of speech. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP-89), pp. 238-241.
9. Hermes D.J. Timing of pitch movements and accentuation of syllables in Dutch. Journal of Acoustical Society of America. 102(4):1997;2390-2402.
10. Hermes, D.J., Beaugendre, F., House, D., 1997a. Individual differences in accentuation boundaries in Dutch. IPO Annual Progress Report 32, Eindhoven, pp. 131-138.
11. Hermes, D.J., Beaugendre, F., House, D., 1997b. Temporal alignment of accentuation boundaries in Dutch. In: Proceedings of the ESCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Intonation, Athens, Greece, 22-25 September 1997, pp. 879-882.
12. Hermes D.J., van Gestel J.C. The frequency scale of speech intonation. Journal of Acoustical Society of America. 90:1991;97-102.
13. Hill D., Reid N. An experiment on the perception of intonational features. International Journal of Man-Machines Studies. 9(13):1977;337-347.
14. House D. Tonal Perception in Speech. 1990;Lund University Press, Lund.
15. House, D., Hermes, D.J., Beaugendre, F., 1997. Temporal-alignment categories of accent-lending rises and falls. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech), Vol. 2, Rhodes, pp. 879-882.
16. House, D., Hermes, D.J., Beaugendre, F., 1998. Perception of tonal rises and falls for accentuation and phrasing in Swedish. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP-98), Sydney, pp. 2799-2802.
17. Ladd D. Intonational Phonology. 1996;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
18. Rietveld T., Gussenhoven C. Aligning pitch targets in speech synthesis: Effects of syllable structure. Journal of Phonetics. 23:1995;375-385.
19. Sagey E. On the ill-formedness of crossing association lines. Linguistic Inquiry. 19:1988;108-118.
20. 't Hart J., Collier R., Cohen A. A Perceptual Study of Intonation: An Experimental-phonetic Approach to Speech Melody. 1991;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
21. Terken, J., Hermes, D.J., forthc. The Perception of Prominence, Prosody: Theory and Experiment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
22. Touati P. Structures prosodiques du suèdois et du français. 1987;Lund University Press, Lund.
23. Vaissière, J., 1980. La structuration acoustique de la phrase française. Annali Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, pp. 530-560.
24. van Katwijk, A., Govaert, G., 1967. Prominence as a function of the location of pitch movement. IPO Annual Progress Report 2, Eindhoven, pp. 115-117.
25. van Heuven V., Menert L. Why stress position bias? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 100:1996;2439-2451.