|
Volumn 344, Issue 9, 2001, Pages 677-678
|
Are appropriateness criteria ready for use in clinical practice?
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY;
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT;
CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE;
EDITORIAL;
HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION;
HUMAN;
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY;
TREATMENT INDICATION;
ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY;
CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS;
CORONARY DISEASE;
HEALTH SERVICES MISUSE;
HUMANS;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE);
UTILIZATION REVIEW;
|
EID: 0035282730
PISSN: 00284793
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200103013440912 Document Type: Editorial |
Times cited : (47)
|
References (14)
|