Longitudinal stark effect in parabolic quantum dots

Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Part 2: Letters

Volumn 40, Issue 3 B, 2001, Pages 2002-2005

  Rlnaldi, Ross ^a   Degiorgi, Milena ^a   Devittorio, Massimo ^b   Melcarne, Angelo ^b   Visconti, Paolo ^b   Cingolani, Roberte ^b   Lipsanen, Harri ^b   Sopanen, Markku ^a   Drufva, T ^a   Tulkki, Jukka ^a  

^a INFM   (Italy)

^b AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Microluminescence; Quantum dots; Stark effect

Indexed keywords

ELECTROOPTICAL EFFECTS; LOW TEMPERATURE EFFECTS; METALLORGANIC VAPOR PHASE EPITAXY; PHOTOLUMINESCENCE; SEMICONDUCTING INDIUM GALLIUM ARSENIDE; SEMICONDUCTOR GROWTH; SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM WELLS;

PARABOLIC QUANTUM DOTS; STARK EFFECT;

SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOTS;

EID: 0035267608     PISSN: 00214922     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1143/jjap.40.2002     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Y. Arakawa and H. Sakaki: Appl. Phys. Lett. 40 (1982) 939.
2. M. Asada, Y. Miyamoto and Y. Suematsu: IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-22 (1986) 1915.
3. D. A. B. Miller, D. S. Chemla and S.Schmitt-Rink: Appl. Phys. Lett. 52 (1988) 2154.
4. K. G. Ravikumar, T. Aizawa, K. Matsubara, M. Asada and Y. Suematsu: J. Technol. 9 (1991) 1376.
5. D. A. B. Miller, D. S. Chemla, T. C. Damen, A. C. Gassard, W. Wiegmann, T. H. Wood and C. A. Burrus: Phys. Rev. B 32 (1985) 1043.
6. G. D. Sanders, K. W. Kim and W. C. Holton: Phys. Rev. B 61 (2000) 7526.
7. E. Biolatti, R. C. lotti, P. Zanardi and F. Rossi: Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 5647.
8. H. Lipsanen, M. Sopanen and J. Ahopelto: Phys. Rev. B 51 (1995) 13868.
9. The linewidth of about 2.5 meV is due both to the emission of two or three dots with rather similar dimensions and to the presence of an electric field and interactions with nearby dots. On average 5-6 dots were excited when the spot diameter was of the order of 8 μm. 10) J. Tulkki and A. Heinanneki: Phys. Rev. B 52 (1995) 8239.