A predictive model of mercury fish tissue concentrations for the Southeastern United States

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 941-947

  Qian, Song S ^a,e   Warren Hicks, William ^b   Keating, Jim ^c   Moore, Dwayne R J ^d   Teed, R Scott ^d  

^a PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Cadmus Group   (United States)

^c U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^d Cadmus Group   (Canada)

^e Cadmus Group Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; STATISTICAL METHODS; TISSUE;

MERCURY CONCENTRATIONS;

MERCURY (METAL);

MERCURY; WATER;

BIOACCUMULATION; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); FISH; MERCURY (ELEMENT); NUMERICAL MODEL; PREDICTION;

ARTICLE; BIOACCUMULATION; BODY WEIGHT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FISH; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; NONHUMAN; PH; PREDICTION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL; TISSUE LEVEL; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; BODY WEIGHT; FISHES; FORECASTING; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MERCURY; MODELS, STATISTICAL; SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0035264662     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es0013069     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Weiner, J.; Spry, D. In Interpreting Concentrations of Environmental Contaminants in Wildlife Tissues; Heinz, G., Beyer, N.; Eds.; Lewis Publishers: Chelsea, MI, 1994.
2. Zilloux, E.; Porcella, D.; Benoit, J. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1993, 12, 2245-2264.
3. Moore, D. R. J.; Sample, B.; Suter, G.; Parkhurst, B.; Teed, R. S. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1999, 18(12), 2941-2953.
4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The National Survey of Mercury Concentrations in Fish: Database Summary 1990-1995; Contract No. 68-C4-0051; Prepared by The Cadmus Group, Inc.: 1920 Highway 54, Executive Park, Suite 100, Durham, NC, 1999.
5. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Mercury Study Report to Congress Volume IV: An Ecological Assessment for Anthropogenic Mercury Emissions in the United States; EPA-452/R-97-004; Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards and Office of Research and Development: December 1997a.
6. Gilmour, C. C.; Henry, E. A. Environ. Pollut. 1991, 71, 131-169.
7. Winfrey, M. R.; Rudd, J. W. M. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1990, 9, 853-869.
8. Sorensen, J. A.; Glass, G. E.; Schmidt, K. W.; Huber, J. K.; Rapp, G..R., Jr. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1990, 24, 1716-1727.
9. Bloom, N. S.; Watras, C. J. Sci. Total Environ. 1989, 87/88.
10. Bozongo J.-C. J.; Kenneth, J. H.; Chen, Y.; Lyons, W. B.; Warwick, J. J.; Miller, G. C; Lechler, P. J. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1996, 15(5), 677-683.
11. Coppoolse, J. In Heavy Metals in the Environment Allan, R. J., ;Nriagu, J. O., Eds.; Toronto, September 1993; Vol. 1.
12. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Mercury Study Report to Congress Volume II: An Inventory of Anthropogenic Mercury Emissions in the United States; EPA-452/R-97-004; Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards and Office of Research and Development: December 1997b.
13. Ramlal, P. S.; Anema, C; Furutani, A.; Hecky, R. E.; Rudd, J. Can. Technol. Rep. Fish Aquat. Sci. 1987, 70(1490), 1-35.