Influence of prime-probe stimulus onset asynchrony and prime precuing manipulations on semantic priming effects with words in a lexical-decision task

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 75-91

  Orteils, Juan J ^a   Noguera, Carmen ^a   Abad, María J F ^b   Lupiáñez, Juan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALMERÍA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JAÉN   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; RANDOMIZATION; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS;

ADULT; CUES; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; VOCABULARY;

EID: 0035260434     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.27.1.75     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Allport, D. A., Tipper, S. P., & Chmiel, N. R. J. (1985). Perceptual integration and postcategorical filtering. In M. I. Posner & O. Marin (Eds.), Attention & performance XI (pp. 107-132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Broadbent, D. E., & Gathercole, S. E. (1990). The processing of non-target words: Semantic or not? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A, 3-37.
3. Canas, J. J., Bajo, M. T., Burton, A., Burton, E., Corsbur, M., & Padilla, J. (1994, September). Word recognition across orthographies: Semantic priming in naming and lexical decision. Paper presented at the VII Conference of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology, Lisbon, Portugal.
4. Chiappe, D. L., & MacLeod, C. M. (1995). Negative priming is not task bound: A consistent pattern across naming and categorization tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 364-369.
5. Di Pace, E., Longoni, A. M., & Zoccolotti, P. (1991). Semantic processing of unattended parafoveal words. Acta Psychologica, 77, 21-34.
6. Dixon, P. (1986). Attention and interference in the perception of brief visual displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 133-148.
7. Dixon, P., Gordon, R. D., Leung, A., & Di Lollo, V. (1997). Attentional components of partial report. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1253-1271.
8. Fox, E. (1994). Attentional bias in anxiety: A defective inhibition hypothesis. Cognition & Emotion, 8, 165-195.
9. Fox, E. (1995a). Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 145-173.
10. Fox, E. (1995b). Pre-cueing target location reduces interference but not negative priming from visual distractors. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 26-40.
11. Fuentes, L. J. (1998). Tiempos de Reacción en Experimentos de Psicología (TREXP) [Reaction Time in Psychology Experiments]. Unpublished computer software. Almería, Spain: University of Almería.
12. Fuentes, L. J. , Carmona, E., Agis, I. F., & Catena, A. (1994). The role of anterior attentional system in semantic processing of both foveal and parafoveal words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 17-25.
13. Fuentes, L. J., & Ortells, J. J. (1993). Facilitation and interference effects in a Stroop-like task: Evidence in favor of semantic processing of parafoveally-presented stimuli. Acta Psychologica, 84, 213-229.
14. Fuentes, L. J., & Tudela, P. (1992). Semantic processing of foveally and parafoveally presented words in a lexical decision task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 299-322.
15. Gatti, S. V., & Egeth, H. E. (1978). Failure of spatial selectivity in vision. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11, 181-184.
16. Henderson, J. M. (1996). Spatial precues affect target discrimination in the absence of visual noise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 780-787.
17. Holender, D. (1986). Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9, 1-66.
18. Houghton, G., & Tipper, S. P. (1994). A dynamic model of selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory mechanism in attention, memory and language. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
19. Inhoff, A. W. (1982). Parafoveal word perception: A further case against semantic preprocessing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 137-145.
20. Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1980). Parafoveal word perception: A case against semantic preprocessing. Perception and Psychophysics, 27, 457-464.
21. Jordan, T. R., Patching, G. R, & Milner, A. D. (1998). Central fixations are inadequately controlled by instructions alone: Implications for studying cerebral asymmetry. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 371-391.
22. Kane, M. J., May, C. P., Hasher, L., Rahhal, T., & Stolzfus, E. R. (1997). Dual mechanisms of negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 632-650.
23. Lambert, A. J., Beard, C. T., & Thompson, R. J. (1988). Selective attention, visual laterality, awareness, and perceiving the meaning of parafoveally presented words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 615-652.
24. Lowe, D. G. (1985). Further investigation of inhibitory mechanisms in attention. Memory & Cognition, 13, 74-80.
25. Lupiáñez, J., & Tudela, P. (1995, July). Negative and positive semantic priming with lexical decision task: A time-course function. Paper presented at the IV European Congress of Psychology, Athens, Greece.
26. Marcel A. J. (1980). Conscious and preconscious recognition of polysemous words: Locating the selective effects of prior verbal context. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII (pp. 435-437). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. May, C. P., Kane, M. J., & Hasher, L. (1995). Determinants of negative priming. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 35-54.
28. Mewhort, D. J. K., Campbell, A. J., Marchetti, F. M., & Campbell, J. I. D. (1981). Identification, localization, and "iconic" memory: An evaluation of the bar-probe task. Memory & Cognition, 9, 50-67.
29. Milliken, B., Joordens. S., Merikle, P., & Seiffert, A. (1998). Selective attention: A re-evaluation of the implications of negative priming. Psychological Review, 105, 203-229.
30. Milliken, B., Tipper, S. P., & Weaver, B. (1994). Negative priming in a spatial localization task: Feature mismatching and distractor inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 624-646.
31. Mondor, T. A., & Bryden, M. P. (1992). On the relation between visual spatial attention and visual field asymmetries. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 529-555.
32. Moore, C. M. (1994). Negative priming depends on probe-trial conflict: Where has all the inhibition gone? Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 133-147.
33. Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Neely, J. H., & Keefe, D. E. (1989). Semantic context effects on visual word processing: A hybrid prospective/retrospective processing theory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 24, pp. 207-248). New York: Academic Press.
35. Neely J. H., Keefe, D. E., & Ross, K. (1989). Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: Roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1003-1019.
36. Neill, W. T. (1997). Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1291-1305.
37. Neill, W. T., & Kahan, T. A. (1999). Response conflict reverses priming: A replication. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 304-308.
38. Neill W. T., & Lissner, L. S. (1988, April). Attention and selective inhibition in alphanumeric character matching. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Buffalo, NY.
39. Neill, W. T., & Valdes, L. A. (1992). The persistence of negative priming: Steady-state or decay? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 565-576.
40. Neill W. T., Valdes, L. A., & Terry, K. M. (1995). Selective attention and the inhibitory control of cognition. In F. N. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.). New perspectives on interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 207-261). New York: Academic Press.
41. Neill W. T., Valdes, L. A., Terry, K. M., & Gorfein, D. S. (1992). The persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 993-1000.
42. Neill W. T., & Westberry, R. L. (1987). Selective attention and the suppression of cognitive noise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 327-334.
43. Neumann, E., & DeSchepper, B. G. (1991). Costs and benefits of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 1136-1145
44. Neumann, E., & DeSchepper, B. G. (1992). An inhibition based fan effect: Evidence for an active suppression mechanism in selective attention. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 1-40.
45. Neumann, E., McCloskey, M. S., & Felio, A. C. (1999). Cross-language positive priming disappears, negative priming doesn't: Evidence for two sources of selective inhibition. Memory & Cognition, 27, 1051-1063.
46. Orteils J J., & Tudela, P. (1996). Positive and negative semantic priming of attended and unattended parafoveal words in a lexical decision task. Acta Psychologica, 94, 209-226.
47. Ortells, J. J., Tudela, P., Noguera, C., & Abad, M. J. (1998). Attentional orienting within visual field in a lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Perfomance, 24, 1675-1689.
48. Paap, K. R., & Newsome, S. L. (1981). Parafoveal information is not sufficient to produce semantic or visual priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 457-466.
49. Park, J., & Kanwisher, N. (1994). Negative priming for spatial location: Identity mismatching, not distractor inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Perfomance, 20, 613-623.
50. Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160-174.
51. Richards, A. (1999). The effects of cueing target location and response mode on interference and negative priming using a visual selection paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 449-463.
52. Ruthruff, E., & Miller, J. (1995). Negative priming depends on ease of selection. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 715-723.
53. Soto, P., Sebastian, M. V., García, E., & Del Amo, T. (1982). Categorización y datas normativos en España [Categorization and associative norms in Spain]. Madrid, Spain: Cantoblanco.
54. Tenpenny, P. L. (1995). Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 339-363.
55. Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571-590.
56. Tipper, S. P. (in press). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
57. Tipper, S. P., & Baylis, G. C. (1987). Individual differences in selective attention: The relation of priming and interference to cognitive failure. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 667-675.
58. Tipper, S. P., & Cranston, M. (1985). Selective attention and priming: inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 591-611.
59. Tipper, S. P. & Driver, J. (1988). Negative priming between pictures and words in a selective attention task: Evidence for semantic processing of ignored stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 16, 64-70.
60. Tipper, S. P., & Milliken, B. (1996). Distinguishing between inhibition and episodic retrieval based accounts of negative priming. In A. F. Kramer, M. Coles, & G. Logan (Eds.). Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 337-364). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
61. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Cameron, S., Brehaut, J. C., & Bastedo, J. (1991). Inhibitory mechanisms of attention in identification tasks: Time course and disruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 681-692.
62. Underwood, G. (1976). Semantic interference from unattended printed words. British Journal of Psychology, 67, 327-338.
63. Underwood, G., Rusted, J., & Thwaites, S. (1983). Parafoveal words are effective in both hemifields: Preattentive processing of semantic and phonological codes. Perception, 12, 213-221.
64. Yee, P. L. (1991). Semantic inhibition of ignored words during figure classification task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 127-153.